Hermitian and Unitary matrices

  • Thread starter Thread starter snakebite
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hermitian Matrices
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding a unitary matrix U such that the expression (U bar)^T(H)(U) results in a diagonal matrix, given the Hermitian matrix H = [{7,2,0},{2,4,-2},{0,-2,5}].

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to find the eigenvalues of the matrix H but expresses difficulty due to complex equations. Some participants question the setup and suggest confirming the matrix H. Others propose that the correct approach involves finding the eigenvectors and constructing U from them. There is a discussion about the normalization of eigenvectors and the need for orthogonality when eigenvalues are not distinct.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various interpretations of the problem. Guidance has been provided regarding the normalization of eigenvectors and the necessity of ensuring orthogonality, particularly when dealing with repeated eigenvalues.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential complications arising from the eigenvalues and the requirement for orthogonality among eigenvectors, which may not be guaranteed in this case.

snakebite
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hello,

the problem is asking me to find a unitary matrix U such that (U bar)^T(H)(U) is diagonal. And we have H = [{7,2,0},{2,4,-2},{0,-2,5}]


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know where to start. I tried getting the eigenvalues of the matrix A but that lead to very long and complicated equations with 3rd roots which i doubt is the correct way.
Other than that I have no idea what to start off with

Thanks you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the matrix A? Do you mean H? If so, are you sure you have the right H? That one leads to messy results, so maybe you are doing the problem correctly.
 
Yea I'm sorry there is no A i meant H. And yes I'm sure i have to correct matrix H on. So the correct way would be to just find the eigenvectors and U would just be a matrix with the eigenvectors as the columns?
 
Yes, with the eigenvector normalized.
 
I did what you said on another example where H = [{-2,1+i,1-i},{1-i,-1,-2i},{1+i,2i,-1}]
I got the eigenvalues which are 2, -3, -3 (I'm sure about this) and the normalized eigenvectors are
e1=[{(1-i)/[tex]\sqrt{10}[/tex],-i[tex]\sqrt{2/5}[/tex],[tex]\sqrt{2/5}[/tex]}]
e2 = [{(-1-i)/[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex],1/[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex], 0}]
e3 = [{(-1+i)/[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex],0,1/[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex],}]

Once again I am positive about these eigenvalues,
So let U = [e1,e2,e3] (column of U are the normalized eigenvectors)
When I do the operation
(U bar)^T.U I get [{1,0,0},{0,1,-2i/3},{0,2i/3,1}] which is not quite the identity matrix (which i should be getting)

Is there something i should do to the eigenvectors to get U to be unitary?

Thanks again
 
Since e2 and e3 have the same eigenvalue, any linear combination of e2 and e3 is also an eigenvector of H, and the usual process for finding eigenvectors won't guarantee orthogonality. You need to make them orthogonal by hand, using the Gram-Schmidt process. (In contrast, if the eigenvalues were all distinct, you get orthogonality automatically.)
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K