Graduate Hermitian Operators and Projectors in Linear Algebra

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the properties of Hermitian operators and projectors in linear algebra, specifically examining two matrices. The first matrix is identified as non-symmetric and not Hermitian, while the second matrix is both Hermitian and a projector. The conversation explores how an operator can be Hermitian in one basis but not in another, raising questions about the nature of basis transformations and symmetry preservation. Additionally, the definition of a projector is clarified, emphasizing that it should be idempotent and Hermitian in the context of inner product spaces. The distinction in terminology across different languages regarding projectors is also noted.
LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
Matrix
<br /> \left[<br /> \begin{array}{rr}<br /> 1 &amp; 1 \\<br /> 0&amp; 0 \\<br /> \end{array} \right]
is not symmetric. When we find eigenvalues of that matrix we get ##\lambda_1=1##, ##\lambda_2=0##, or we get matrix
<br /> \left[<br /> \begin{array}{rr}<br /> 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0&amp; 0 \\<br /> \end{array} \right].
First matrix is not hermitian, whereas second one it is. How it is possible that some operator is hermitian in one basis, and is not in the other one. Second matrix is also a projector, and the first one it is not. How that is possible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you considered how a basis transformation has to look like, in order to conserve symmetry? Does yours look like one? And what do you mean by a projector? The first matrix is also a projection, i.e. surjective, just not at the same angle.
 
fresh_42 said:
And what do you mean by a projector?.

In English linear algebra references, a projector (on an inner product space) typically is a linear transformation that is a projection, and that has orthogonal null space and range, i.e., idempotent and Hermitian. I am not sure if other languages make this distinction.
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K