Engineering Hertz contact problems of three cylinders

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the force applied by the upper roller in a Hertz contact problem. The original calculation yielded an incorrect normal force of 878.57 N, while the correct answer is stated to be 818.1 N. Participants clarify the angle calculation and discuss potential discrepancies, including factors like deformation and friction, although they conclude that the problem assumes ideal conditions. Ultimately, it is revealed that the professor provided incorrect numbers, validating the participants' calculations. The thread emphasizes the importance of accurate data in solving engineering problems.
Amaelle
Messages
309
Reaction score
54
Homework Statement
look at the image
Relevant Equations
hertz contact
Greetings
i´m trying to find the Force applied by the upper roller to calculate the contact surface.

1653920730222.png


Here is indeed my solution
1653920876346.png


2*FR1* cos31,38=F=1500N
FR1=878,57N (which is wrong the correct solution says 818,1N)
FR1 is the force normal to the surface of contact.

any help would highly appreciated

thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, I'm not seeing where "L" is defined...
 
  • Like
Likes Amaelle
Sorry L and S are equal to 0 , it was for the students so that each one do a different assignment sorry for the confusion :)
 
Amaelle said:
Homework Statement:: look at the image
Relevant Equations:: hertz contact

cos31,38
In that case, I get a different value for that angle. Can you show your calculation for how you solved for it?
 
  • Like
Likes Amaelle
Thank you here it is
1653925539238.png

we have an isoscele triangle
as you can see the first side is the some of the R1+R2=48
I got the other side by Pythagore
48^2-25^2=1679 means the side value is 40,97
and then the angle =invers.tangente(25/40,97) =31,38°
thank you!
 
Oh, I see now that I misread this as c = 25 + 5. But if that is "S" and not "5", then I get the same angle as you. I'm not sure where the discrepancy is in your solution then...

1653927630260.png
 
  • Informative
Likes Amaelle
thank you for taking time to answer me!
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
berkeman said:
I'm not sure where the discrepancy is in your solution then...
Could it have something to do with slight deformation or friction at the contact points? If they are infinitely hard and frictionless surfaces I think your answer is correct. But since they give so much other information... What chapter is this out of in the book? Do they discuss any other factors that would affect this calculation in that part of the text?
 
  • Like
Likes Amaelle
  • #10
berkeman said:
Could it have something to do with slight deformation or friction at the contact points? If they are infinitely hard and frictionless surfaces I think your answer is correct. But since they give so much other information... What chapter is this out of in the book? Do they discuss any other factors that would affect this calculation in that part of the text?
Indeed one of the asymptions is the absence of frictions, indeed I'm surprised as you because this is an undergrad course so there shouldn't be any hidden tricks :oldconfused:
 
  • #11
Realistic assumptions, given the material properties and that this is an undergrad problem:

Zero deflection of rollers due to Hertz contact stress
Zero deflection in bearings
Zero friction
No hidden tricks

I get exactly the same contact force as the OP - 878.57 N.

I agree with the calculations by both @Amaelle and @berkeman, and have no idea where the given answer came from. I can only guess that somebody entered a number wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes Amaelle and berkeman
  • #12
  • Like
Likes jrmichler and berkeman
  • #13
just an update! the solution was correct it was the Professor mistake to give wrong numbers
Thanks a million guys!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Tom.G, jrmichler and berkeman

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
774
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
218
Replies
1
Views
6K
Back
Top