A Hidden Assumptions in Bell's Theorem?

  • #331
Nullstein said:
In the no-BSM case, QM predicts that there is no entanglement between 1&4 in the full ensemble
Yes.

Nullstein said:
and that there is an entangled subensemble.
No, QM does not predict this. Cherry picking "predicts" this, but I don't agree that's a valid method.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #332
Nullstein said:
This fact follows from the axioms of QM
We've already been over this multiple times. The math is one thing. Claims about what the math means and what math is relevant is another.
 
  • #333
Thread closed for moderation.
 
  • Like
Likes Lord Jestocost and jim mcnamara
  • #334
The thread will remain closed
 
  • Like
Likes Lord Jestocost

Similar threads

A Assumptions of the Bell theorem
  • · Replies 874 ·
30
Replies
874
Views
43K
A Understanding Barandes' microscopic theory of causality
  • · Replies 292 ·
10
Replies
292
Views
10K
A Game theory, quantum physics and the Bell inequality (paper)
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”?
  • · Replies 119 ·
4
Replies
119
Views
3K
I Is QBism simply a subjective interpretation of science?
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
I A tool for checking claims of violating Bell's theorem
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
A Loophole-free test of local realism via Hardy's violation
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
I Model used to refute Bell's theorem
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
I Quantum Realism and Bell Locality
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
I No relativistic Bohmian mechanics and superluminal causation
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
3K