Higgs Boson vs GR's Spacetime: Is Mass Effect Obsolete?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the relationship between the Higgs boson and the concept of mass effect in the context of spacetime, particularly in relation to special relativity (SR) and general relativity (GR). Participants explore whether the confirmation of the Higgs boson would render the mass effect obsolete.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the validity of a claim that the Higgs boson, if proven, would make the mass effect obsolete, expressing concern over the implications for their understanding of SR and GR.
  • Another participant requests a citation for the article that makes this claim, suggesting that the assertion may be incorrect but acknowledges the need to review the source.
  • A third participant mentions that the article is lengthy and refers to a specific appendix discussing Newtonian laws, indicating a focus on foundational concepts.
  • One participant dismisses the paper as "crackpot nonsense," asserting that such claims are not suitable for discussion within the forum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; there are competing views regarding the validity of the claims made in the referenced article, with some participants expressing skepticism about its credibility.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the uncertainty surrounding the implications of the Higgs boson on established theories of mass and spacetime, with references to specific sections of the article that may not be universally accepted.

zepp0814
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
i was just reading a article that said that if the higgs boson is proven for fact, then the concept of the mass effect (spacetime pressure and curvature) would be obsolete. Is this true? i spent so much time teaching my self about SR and GR.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you cite the article? The claim seems wrong, but without seeing the actual article it is hard to say.
 
the article is actually really long (It more of like a paper) <crackpot link removed> the part about this matter is towards the part appendix "A" about Newtonian laws.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That paper is crackpot nonsense, and we don't discuss crackpottery here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K