I High Background Radiation Rates - Is This Normal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dlgoff
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radiation
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around high background radiation readings observed on a Ludlum Model 3 Survey Meter, initially reported as 2-3K counts/minute. The user later realized they were on the X0.1 scale, which contributed to the confusion regarding the readings. After testing with a check source, the background readings stabilized between 200-300 counts/minute when taken outside, suggesting the detector was functioning correctly. Concerns about calibration arose, as the user had recently purchased the device without calibration stickers. The conversation also touched on the influence of auroral activity on radiation readings, clarifying that such phenomena do not typically affect ground-level measurements.
  • #31
gleem said:
Right so why the 2 - 3 Kcpm counts in the OP?

Don gave an answer to that in his first post, he has it on the wrong setting ...

Never mind, I was on the X0.1 scale. But that's still high, isn't it?
Ohhh and auroral activity isn't going to make a detector read anything extra... The aurora is produced by
mostly electrons and some protons being trapped in the Earth's magnetic field

And fortunately, because of our atmosphere's protection, reading a burst of x-rays, when they arrive, several days
before the auroral activity begins is unlikely to occur at ground level either.
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
davenn said:
Don gave an answer to that in his first post, he has it on the wrong setting ...
Looks like the half-life of my memory is about 1 post. :sorry:

davenn said:
Ohhh and auroral activity isn't going to make a detector read anything extra... The aurora is produced by
mostly electrons and some protons being trapped in the Earth's magnetic field
Admittedly that was a bit of a reach but x-rays and gamma rays are a small component of the radiation, and gammas from neutron activation have been observed and Don's NaI detector is quite sensitive to low-energy x-rays.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn and dlgoff

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
888