Higher order D.E. to linear system of 1st order D.E.'s

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on transforming a system of higher-order differential equations into a first-order system and determining the Jacobian matrix for that system. The equations given are u''' = x^2uu'' - uv' and v'' = xvv' + 4u'. The transformation involves defining y_1 = u, y_2 = u', y_3 = u'', y_4 = v, and y_5 = v', leading to the first-order system: dy_1/dx = y_2, dy_2/dx = y_3, dy_3/dx = x^2y_1y_3 - y_1y_5, dy_4/dx = y_5, and dy_5/dx = xy_4y_5 + 4y_2. The Jacobian matrix is constructed by treating all variables as independent, resulting in specific partial derivatives.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations, specifically higher-order and first-order systems.
  • Familiarity with Jacobian matrices and their applications in systems of equations.
  • Knowledge of numerical analysis concepts relevant to differential equations.
  • Proficiency in mathematical notation and manipulation of derivatives.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of converting higher-order differential equations to first-order systems in detail.
  • Learn about the applications of Jacobian matrices in stability analysis and dynamical systems.
  • Explore numerical methods for solving systems of differential equations, such as Runge-Kutta methods.
  • Investigate the implications of treating variables as independent in the context of Jacobian matrices.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, engineering, and physics who are working with differential equations and numerical analysis, particularly those involved in modeling dynamic systems.

jjr
Messages
51
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



\textbf{(a)} This is an exercise from a course on numerical analysis.

Write the system of differential equations

u''' = x^2uu'' - uv'

v'' = xvv' + 4u'

as a first order system of differential equations, \textbf{y'} = \textbf{y}(x,\textbf{y}).

\textbf{(b)} Determine the Jacobian matrix  \textbf{f}_\textbf{y}(x,\textbf{y}) for the system in (a).

Homework Equations



Form of Jacobian matrix:

<br /> J =<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> \frac{\partial{F_1}}{\partial{x_1}} &amp; \cdots &amp; \frac{\partial{F_1}}{\partial{x_n}} \\<br /> \vdots &amp; \ddots &amp; \vdots \\<br /> \frac{\partial{F_m}}{\partial{x_1}} &amp; \cdots &amp; \frac{\partial{F_m}}{\partial{x_n}}<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



I might have solved part (a) (I'm not quite sure to be honest), but I have a few problems in part b) that I need help with.

I know the canonical way of transforming a single d'th order D.E. into a system of first order D.E.'s, but was a bit confused when there were two equations. Here is what I did:

I let y_1 = u; y_2 = u&#039;; y_3 = u&#039;&#039;; y_4 = v; y_5 = v&#039;, and thus

\frac{dy_1}{dx} = y_2; \frac{dy_2}{dx} = y_3; \frac{dy_3}{dx} = x^2y_1y_3 - y_1y_5; \frac{y_4}{dx} = y_5; \frac{dy_5}{dx} = xy_4y_5+4y_2

Could this be the correct way to transform these equations?

As for b), referring to the matrix above, I reckon F_1 = \frac{dy_1}{dx} = y_2; F_2 = \frac{dy_2}{dx} = y_3 and so on, whereas x_1 = y_1; x_2 = y_2 and so on. Am I right here?

When I take the derivative of say y_2 with respect to y_3 is it zero or is there some implicit dependence on y_3 in y_2? If there is not then it should be zero, and in fact most of the entries in the Jacobian should be zero?

Thanks,
J
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
jjr said:

Homework Statement



\textbf{(a)} This is an exercise from a course on numerical analysis.

Write the system of differential equations

u&#039;&#039;&#039; = x^2uu&#039;&#039; - uv&#039;

v&#039;&#039; = xvv&#039; + 4u&#039;

as a first order system of differential equations, \textbf{y&#039;} = \textbf{y}(x,\textbf{y}).

\textbf{(b)} Determine the Jacobian matrix  \textbf{f}_\textbf{y}(x,\textbf{y}) for the system in (a).


Homework Equations



Form of Jacobian matrix:

<br /> J =<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> \frac{\partial{F_1}}{\partial{x_1}} &amp; \cdots &amp; \frac{\partial{F_1}}{\partial{x_n}} \\<br /> \vdots &amp; \ddots &amp; \vdots \\<br /> \frac{\partial{F_m}}{\partial{x_1}} &amp; \cdots &amp; \frac{\partial{F_m}}{\partial{x_n}}<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br />
This is wrong. There is only a single variable "x", not "x_1", "x_2", etc. the derivatives should be with respect to y_1, y_2, etc.

The Attempt at a Solution



I might have solved part (a) (I'm not quite sure to be honest), but I have a few problems in part b) that I need help with.

I know the canonical way of transforming a single d'th order D.E. into a system of first order D.E.'s, but was a bit confused when there were two equations. Here is what I did:

I let y_1 = u; y_2 = u&#039;; y_3 = u&#039;&#039;; y_4 = v; y_5 = v&#039;, and thus

\frac{dy_1}{dx} = y_2; \frac{dy_2}{dx} = y_3; \frac{dy_3}{dx} = x^2y_1y_3 - y_1y_5; \frac{y_4}{dx} = y_5; \frac{dy_5}{dx} = xy_4y_5+4y_2

Could this be the correct way to transform these equations?
Yes, that is correct.

As for b), referring to the matrix above, I reckon F_1 = \frac{dy_1}{dx} = y_2; F_2 = \frac{dy_2}{dx} = y_3 and so on, whereas x_1 = y_1; x_2 = y_2 and so on. Am I right here?

When I take the derivative of say y_2 with respect to y_3 is it zero or is there some implicit dependence on y_3 in y_2? If there is not then it should be zero, and in fact most of the entries in the Jacobian should be zero?

Thanks,
J
For the purposes of the Jacobian, treat all variables, x and all of the various "y"s, as independent. That is, the derivative of y_2 with respect to y_3 is 0 while the derivative of x^2y_1y_2- y_1y_5 with respect to y_1 is x^2y_2- y_5.
 
That's excellent, thank you!
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K