MHB Higher order derivatives calculation

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of higher order derivatives, specifically questioning the validity of a formula involving derivatives and powers. Participants clarify that the numbers in parentheses represent derivatives, while the expression $(-4)^M$ is treated as an ordinary power. An example using the function $F(x) = e^x \sin(x)$ is provided to illustrate the application of the product rule for derivatives. The conversation leads to an inductive proof demonstrating that the fourth derivative of the function aligns with the proposed formula. The proof concludes by confirming the induction hypothesis, establishing the validity of the original claim.
4445
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know why this is true?
View attachment 7432
 

Attachments

  • MATH.png
    MATH.png
    3.1 KB · Views: 135
Physics news on Phys.org
Is $M$ a non-negative integer?
Do the numbers in parentheses all indicate derivatives, while $(-4)^M$ is an ordinary power?
I cannot see why what you wrote would be true, then. For example, it fails for $F(x) = e^x$.
 
Thank you for your answer. F(x) = (e^x)*sin(x). The numbers in parenthesis indicate derivatives
 
I think I would begin by looking at the $n$th order derivative of a product formula:

$$\frac{d^n}{dx^n}\left(f(x)\cdot g(x)\right)=\sum_{k=0}^n\left({n \choose k}f^{(n-k)}(x)\cdot g^{(k)}(x)\right)$$

And use this formula in an inductive proof, where the formula in question is your induction hypothesis $P_M$, where $M\in\mathbb{N_0}$.

Can you proceed?
 
As a follow up, let's first compute:

$$\frac{d^4}{dx^4}\left(e^x\sin(x)\right)=e^x\sin(x)+4e^x\cos(x)-6e^x\sin(x)-4e^x\cos(x)+e^x\sin(x)=-4e^x\sin(x)$$

And so our induction hypothesis is:

$$\frac{d^{4(M+1)}}{dx^{4(M+1)}}\left(e^x\sin(x)\right)=(-4)^{M+1}\left(e^x\sin(x)\right)$$

It is easy to see now, that taking the 4th derivative of both sides, we get:

$$\frac{d^{4((M+1)+1)}}{dx^{4((M+1)+1)}}\left(e^x\sin(x)\right)=(-4)^{(M+1)+1}\left(e^x\sin(x)\right)$$

Since we have obtained $P_{M+2}$ from $P_{M+1}$, this completes our proof by induction.
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K