MHB Hint for a problem on condition number

  • Thread starter Thread starter kalish1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Condition
kalish1
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
I would like to know if the second part of this question is asking something different.

**Problem:** Consider the linear system $19x_1+20x_2=b_1, 20x_1+21x_2=b_2$. Compute the condition number of the coefficient matrix. Is the system well-conditioned with respect to perturbations of the right-handside constants ${b_1,b_2}$?

Do I need to introduce a $\delta$ into the right-handside, or is computing the coefficient number enough to conjecture about the condition of the right-handside constants?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The second part of the problem as asking if the condition number you just computed is highly dependent on $b_{1}$ and $b_{2}$. What happens if you change the RHS's just a little? Does the condition number change a lot when you do that? I don't think you need to introduce another variable, at least not yet. What do you get for the condition number? And how are you computing it?
 
I get 1601 = 41*41 for the condition number, and I got it by computing the norm of the matrix A and the norm of the matrix A^(-1), an then multiplying them together. The norms of the matrices are both 41.

Isn't this enough for the purposes of this problem?
 
Did you use the formula
$$\|A\|= \max \{ \|Ax \|:x \in \mathbb{R}^{2}, \|x \|=1 \}?$$
If so, what vector norm did you use? Euclidean?
 
I used the following norm:

$$\|A_{n\mathbb x n}|=\max_{1\leq i \leq n}\sum_{j=1}^{n}\|a_{ij}\|$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top