Historical: Mechanized cutting of stone vs. concrete

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the historical use of machine-cut stone compared to concrete in construction. Participants explore the timeline and cultural practices surrounding the mechanization of stone cutting and its applications in ancient and modern structures.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Historical
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that ancient cultures, such as the Romans and Egyptians, used mortar to enhance the structural capabilities of stone and fired brick.
  • Another participant suggests that structural concrete predates the commonly accepted 19th-century French invention, referencing the Pantheon in Rome as an example.
  • A participant involved in manufacturing discusses the modern use of granite in construction, highlighting the precision of machine-cut techniques and the use of diamond rope saws.
  • One participant mentions a specific cultural reference to granite cutting in Aberdeen, suggesting a historical context for mechanized stone cutting.
  • A participant reiterates the question about the prevalence of machine-cut stone, asserting that the Romans utilized machine-cut marble primarily for decorative purposes, indicating a simpler mechanization method involving saw blades.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the historical use of machine-cut stone, with some asserting its existence in ancient cultures while others question the extent and application of such techniques. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the prevalence and significance of machine-cut stone across different cultures.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various historical examples and modern practices, but the discussion lacks consensus on specific cultural practices and the timeline of mechanization in stone cutting.

Breeze
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello.

I've just found this forum as I am looking for an answer to a question. For what it's worth, by way of introduction, I am a software and telephony engineer, with interests in aviation, boat design, and energy-efficient houses. I also write when I can.

Here's my question.

Plenty of ancient and old structures use cut stone structurally. The Romans (and, I have found with a quick Google) the Egyptians used mortar as a bonding agent, to extend the capabilities of stone and fired brick (fired brick being an Indian invention of about 3000 BC).

Structural concrete seems to be a 19th-century French invention, and (along with steel) is the usual material for large structures today.

My question is: Was there ever a culture that used machine-cut stone much? Or did everyone go from natural (or hand-cut) structural stone, to structural concrete and steel, with fired brick for smaller structures? I can't even think of an example of a structure that used machine-sawn stone.

Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
i sell coordinate measurement machines made in Germany..they are made with granite that is mecahnically cut then ground and hand lapped to microns flatness..many components of structures use granite,,all are cut with a diamond rope saw to rough dimensions and machined to tight tolerances..
 
Aberdeen the granite city
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00ml5wx/Jonathan_Meades_Off_Kilter_Episode_1/
About 20 minutes in he goes on about cutting the granite.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Breeze said:
My question is: Was there ever a culture that used machine-cut stone much?
The romans had machine cut marble. It's fairly simple to just mount a few saw blades in a frame and move it back-forth with a treadmill.
It was probably to get uniform thin sheets of marble for decorative use.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
456
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K