Historical origins of dynamics from Lucretius to Hobbes

  • Level: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Keith Mackie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamics
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
Sign up Log in
2 replies · 12K views
Keith Mackie
Messages
6
Reaction score
3
You will get a very nice understanding of the origins of dynamics if you go back to the very beginnings:

1. Lucretius: De Rerum Natura - The Nature of Things published about 60 BC - about the time of Julius Caesar - Chaper 2, The Dance of the Atoms, an introduction to the eariest forms of atomic theory, lines 230 to 240 where he shows that bodies falling through viscous material i.e. air or water suffer a resistance to motion but if they fall though the void, all bodies fall at the same rate.

2. Thomas Hobbs: Levithian published in 1651 when Isaac Newton was only 8 years old. On page 3, chapter 2, 1st and 2nd paragraphs he gives a naive summary of Newton's three laws of motion stating that they are a matter of common sense to all men.

Neither at school nor at university nor anywhere else in a lifetime of reading in science, philosophy of science and science fiction have I ever come across these references. It seems there is much to discover in the archology of science!
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Discussion

Keith Mackie said:
2. Thomas Hobbs: Levithian published in 1651 when Isaac Newton was only 8 years old. On page 3, chapter 2, 1st and 2nd paragraphs he gives a naive summary of Newton's three laws of motion stating that they are a matter of common sense to all men.

Newton studied the published works of those that had gone before him.

"If I have seen further than others, it is by standing upon the shoulders of giants." Isaac Newton

Yes, the history of science is fascinating. It shows that knowledge is not often advanced in as large steps or as quickly as we are often led to believe.
 
Keith Mackie said:
2. Thomas Hobbs: Levithian published in 1651 when Isaac Newton was only 8 years old. On page 3, chapter 2, 1st and 2nd paragraphs he gives a naive summary of Newton's three laws of motion stating that they are a matter of common sense to all men.
I do see a statement of essentially Newton's 1st law, inertia. But nothing that could approach the 2nd or 3rd laws. Still, very interesting!