History channel: Alien engineering show

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The History Channel's "Alien Engineering" explores the fictional premise of UFOs as alien technology, featuring scientists like Lawrence Krauss and Seth Shostak. While the show aims to engage viewers with real-world physics concepts, concerns arise regarding its potential to mislead audiences into believing the content is factual. The discussion highlights the importance of clear disclaimers to differentiate between science fiction and scientific fact, as many viewers may not grasp the fictional nature of the premise. Overall, the show serves as both entertainment and a vehicle for scientific discussion, albeit with a risk of promoting pseudoscience.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts
  • Familiarity with the science fiction genre
  • Knowledge of the impact of media on public perception of science
  • Awareness of the role of disclaimers in educational content
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the influence of science fiction on public understanding of scientific principles
  • Explore the role of disclaimers in media and their effectiveness in conveying factual information
  • Investigate the portrayal of physics in popular media, such as "The X Files" and "Star Trek"
  • Examine case studies of pseudoscience fueled by popular television shows
USEFUL FOR

Science communicators, educators, media analysts, and anyone interested in the intersection of science and entertainment.

pervect
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
10,442
Reaction score
1,606
History channel: "Alien engineering" show

I'm curious if anyone saw this show, or part of it. (I only watched part, it was rather long).

For a rather ga-ga premise, the show seemed to be fairly serious. A friend of mine commented that it might attract kids to science. I know I don't want to start moderating a flood of questions on the "alien anti-gravity drive", though :-).

So, will shows like this turn out to be good for science in the long run, or will they just fuel pseudoscience?
 
Science news on Phys.org
The problem that I have is the impression given that we really have a captured flying saucer. I know from experience that many viewers will take this all as fact. Then again, I don't know that this is avoidable for any science subject. There are those who will take perfectly valid statements and create complete nonsense from it no matter what you say. So perhaps for those who would benefit from the material covered, the context is understood and not a problem. But I think that it should have been made more clear that the premise was fictional and not based on any specific claims. And when I think about it, really that gets dicey because it WAS based on specific claims that they define to be science fiction.

I wanted to check and see if this was the same show that I was thinking of, and spotted this.

In Mid-February, I was featured as one of the scientists interviewed on television for a show, "Alien Engineering," on the History channel, along with a lot of other scientists such as Lawrence Krauss, Seth Shostak, Frank Drake, Marc Millis, and others. This was a lot of fun. The premise of the show was halfway between "The X Files" and "The Physics of Star Trek." It was: suppose UFOs really were flying saucers from an alien civilization-- if so, what would be the physics behind them? It was an explicitly science-fiction premise, used as a springboard to do illuminate some real-world physics thinking.

My one quibble is that the show didn't give quite enough emphasis to the fact that the premise was science fiction... [continued]
http://www.sff.net/people/Geoffrey.Landis/UFO.html

Alien_Engineering.jpg
 
Last edited:
It was a pretty interesting show (the parts I watched anyway), but like Ivan, I'm concerned that those who started watching mid-show and didn't catch the disclaimers periodically dispersed around commercial breaks could have been misled into believing it was true rather than tongue-in-cheek. I was actually laughing over it, because it just seemed to be done in a way that was poking fun at many of the things people claim about "flying saucers" including them being saucers, while actually including interesting factual tidbits about current science and technology.

For example, when they were talking about the sudden turns of the flying saucers, and would say something like, "But of course, all they needed to do was have a device to stop inertia, or else the aliens would be nothing but wet spots on the windshield." :smile:
 
Did anyone watch the Tv mockumentary "When cars attack?" It was made like a serious expose, but it was a joke. Unfortnately a lot of people thought it was real...

Does anyone have a video of that show?

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0406336/#comment
 
I once had a guy swear that you can buy hoverboards, just like those in the movie, Back to the Future. And of course this was back when the movies were popular. So here was a movie that was clearly fiction, but it didn't matter.

Coming next, the Harry Potter Generation. Will we soon be debunking magic-wand claims? Should we anticipate an invasion of dragons and three-headed dogs?
 
Last edited:
Ivan Seeking said:
The problem that I have is the impression given that we really have a captured flying saucer. I know from experience that many viewers will take this all as fact.


That was one of my concerns as well, probably from having run into the same people here on the forums.

I wanted to check and see if this was the same show that I was thinking of, and spotted this.

Yep, that's the show I had in mind.
 
Last edited:
I had seen that show on history channel. I didn't believe everything they said but on the whole the show was "just" entertaining. :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
13K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
15K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K