Can Adding Alternators to Car Wheels Save Energy?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mrblanco
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capture Energy Lost
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using alternators attached to car wheels to capture energy and reduce fuel consumption, particularly for powering electrical components like air conditioning. Participants explore the theoretical implications of this idea, including energy losses and efficiency concerns.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant argues that capturing power from the wheels is inefficient because the engine drives the wheels, meaning fuel is still the primary energy source.
  • Another participant points out that energy losses occur through the transmission and driveline, estimated at around 5.6%, and that alternators typically operate at 40-60% efficiency.
  • Some participants mention that power recovery is only feasible during braking or downhill coasting, referencing regenerative braking used in electric vehicles, but note that this power is insufficient to fully recharge batteries.
  • Concerns are raised about the additional drag caused by the alternators, which could lead to increased fuel consumption during normal driving conditions.
  • One participant shares a personal anecdote about a similar misunderstanding regarding energy generation from a closed system, highlighting the challenges in conveying thermodynamic principles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the concept of using wheel-mounted alternators to save fuel is flawed due to inherent energy losses and inefficiencies, but there are varying degrees of understanding and acceptance of these principles among individuals involved in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the exact calculations needed to demonstrate the inefficiency of the proposed system, indicating a need for further exploration of energy balance and thermodynamic principles.

mrblanco
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have a friend that wants to put several alternators on a car. However, he wants to gather the power from the wheels rather than the engine in order to "capture lost energy" and "save" fuel by running the AC and other electrical components off these alternators. I've already explained that this is not possible because the engine is driving the wheels, therefore, the source of energy is still the fuel in the car. Furthermore, getting the power from the wheels is less efficient than getting it from the engine as there are energy loses through the transmission and the driveline. Also, the new alternator(s) would decrease efficiency because it, itself is not 100% efficient and it would add to drag forces. He's really stuck on this idea, so I need to show him how it's wrong with the math. I am a bit stuck on this part. I know I need to do energy balance by using the first law of thermodynamics but that's as far as I'm getting.

I looked up the loses due to transmission and driveline and those are estimated to be around 5.6%. I also looked at several alternator efficiency curves and their efficiency is usually between 40% with peak efficiency going as high as 60%. I also looked up AC power draw and found it to be around 720 watts.

I haven't done a thermo or physics course in a long time so any help to get the ball rolling here would be much appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi there
welcome to PF
You gave your thread a really bad title, I almost reported it. PPM discussion isn't allowed on PF, not even to debunk it

Maybe the moderators can rename the thread to something more appropriate ? @berkeman

mrblanco said:
I have a friend that wants to put several alternators on a car. However, he wants to gather the power from the wheels rather than the engine in order to "capture lost energy" and "save" fuel by running the AC and other electrical components off these alternators.

power can be gathered during braking or down hill coasting ... google regenerative braking as used by electric cars.
recovered power is low but is used to do some recharging of the battery ... never enough to fully recharge it tho
You can never generate enough power tho and most of the power is still being supplied by the fuel

There is no point trying to recover power during normal flat ground/up hill driving, as the energy lost to the drag caused by the load of the alternator will always be more than the power generated. And you are just going to use more fuel to overcome that loadingDave
 
Last edited:
davenn said:
hi there
welcome to PF
You gave your thread a really bad title, I almost reported it. PPM discussion isn't allowed on PF, not even to debunk it
power can be gathered during braking or down hill coasting ... google regenerative braking as used by electric cars.
recovered power is low but is used to do some recharging of the battery ... never enough to fully recharge it tho
You can never generate enough power tho and most of the power is still being supplied by the fuel

There is no point trying to recover power during normal flat ground/up hill driving, as the energy lost to the drag caused by the load of the alternator will always be more than the power generated. And you are just going to use more fuel to overcome that loadingDave

I had no idea this was a rule (Assuming PPM is perpetual motion) I can't really change the title now though, or can I?

As for your answer, I completely get that and know the only way to get some "free" energy is while going downhill or braking. However, this guy is pretty hard headed and "needs to know for sure." I think if I can just show him the math and why it would never work, I might get through
 
davenn said:
welcome to PF
You gave your thread a really bad title, I almost reported it. PPM discussion isn't allowed on PF, not even to debunk it
Thread title changed to "Capture a car's lost energy"
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
mrblanco said:
I had no idea this was a rule (Assuming PPM is perpetual motion) I can't really change the title now though, or can I?

you should have read the rules when you signed up :wink:
As you can see I tagged a mentor to hopefully change it ( no you cannot)
 
Mark44 said:
Thread title changed to "Capture a car's lost energy"

Thanks @Mark44
 
mrblanco said:
However, this guy is pretty hard headed and "needs to know for sure." I think if I can just show him the math and why it would never work, I might get through

there are ALWAYS losses in a system ... and in any mechanical system, friction accounts for most of it

so power recovered can never come close to power generated
 
Diesel-electric locomotives generate electricity when they're going downhill, but this is to assist in braking, not to make up for the fuel used by the engine(s).
 
  • #10
Hard-headed? My cousin who thinks he can run a water pump from an inverter attached to a battery to run a water wheel to power an alternator/generator which then charges the battery back and he thinks he can create energy. Explained 1st and 2nd thermodynamic laws, friction loss etc. and he refuses to believe. Tried to joke with him saying I was running a battery charger charging a battery that was running an inverter powered by the battery charging -- in other words, the same type of circle just without the extras. He didn't get it.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
It's unfortunately a common problem. But since it looks like the OP had it right all along and the discussion isn't really acceptable here, I think it can be locked.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn and berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
7K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
17K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K