History/Derivation of multi-particle wave functions?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of multi-particle wave functions, specifically the expression |n>|m>±|m>|n> for indistinguishable particles. This formulation arises from the exchange symmetry postulate, which dictates that the wave function of two indistinguishable fermions must be antisymmetric. This property is derived from the Schrödinger equation for two particles in a single state. Recommended resources for further understanding include "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by David J. Griffiths and "Quantum Mechanics" by John S. Townsend.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Schrödinger equation
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts, particularly wave functions
  • Knowledge of exchange symmetry and its implications for indistinguishable particles
  • Basic principles of statistical mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the exchange symmetry postulate in quantum mechanics
  • Read "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by David J. Griffiths for foundational concepts
  • Explore "Quantum Mechanics" by John S. Townsend for advanced derivations
  • Investigate the role of antisymmetry in fermionic systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics, wave functions, and the behavior of indistinguishable particles.

Jerbearrrrrr
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
Hi,
it says on Wikipedia here that "a particle in state n, and a particle in state m" is described by
|n>|m>±|m>|n>
rather than the naive |n>|m>.

I can see why this is sensible on many accounts (eg, you'd want to preserve the predicted probability of finding blah under switching the indices, due to indistinguishability).

Where can I find a derivation of this? Or what should I read up on in order to understand it this better? Perhaps it comes from statistical mechanics or something?

Or is it just a neat "guess" that happens to agree with experiment? (Arguably all of physics is or comes from this, I suppose)

I'm not really sure what to google, but I have tried googling. Usually comes up with lecture notes that derive it by the argument of "We want our final answer to have these certain properties, so let's just take what we have so far from the Schrödinger equation and do this, that and the other to make it have those properties".

I have a maths degree from Cambridge, so I don't mind reading technical material involving equations...but I barely know any physics :(

Thanks,
and sorry for the disorganized post.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The statement you have provided is called the exchange symmetry or exchange symmetry postulate. This postulate states that two indistinguishable particles with spin 1/2 (or any fermion), when exchanged, their wave function must change sign. This is also known as antisymmetry of the wave function.It can be derived from the Schrödinger equation of two particles in a single state. In this case, the exchange symmetry postulate states that the wave function of two particles in a single state must be antisymmetric. It then follows that for two particles in different states, the wave function must be of the form |n>|m>±|m>|n>, where the sign depends on the spin of the particles.For a detailed derivation of the exchange symmetry postulate, you may want to check out some textbooks such as Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by David J. Griffiths or Quantum Mechanics by John S. Townsend.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K