Hollow sphere half submerged in a liquid, find density

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the density of a hollow sphere that is half submerged in a liquid with a specific gravity of 0.80. The inner radius is 9.0 cm and the outer radius is 10.0 cm. The density of the sphere is determined to be 1479 kg/m³ using the formula ρ = m/V, where the mass is derived from the displaced volume of the liquid. Additionally, the participants discuss the buoyancy effects when a stone is submerged in water and how to analyze the forces acting on the system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of buoyancy and Archimedes' principle
  • Familiarity with volume calculations for hollow spheres
  • Knowledge of density calculations and the relationship between mass and volume
  • Basic principles of force analysis in fluid mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of buoyancy and Archimedes' principle in detail
  • Learn how to calculate the volume of composite shapes, including hollow spheres
  • Explore the concept of specific gravity and its applications in fluid mechanics
  • Investigate force analysis techniques in fluid systems, particularly involving buoyant forces
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on fluid mechanics, as well as educators and professionals involved in engineering and material science who require a solid understanding of buoyancy and density calculations.

Taniaz
Messages
364
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A hollow sphere of inner radius 9.0 cm and outer radius 10.0 cm floats half submerged in a liquid of specific gravity 0.80. (a) Calculate the density of the material of which the sphere is made.
(b) What would be the density of a liquid in which the hollow sphere would just float completely submerged?

Density of liquid = 800 kg/m^3
Outer radius = 0.10 m ; inner radius = 0.09 m

2. Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Because it's half submerged so the volume would be:

V = (0.5) (4 pi / 3) * (outer radius^3 ) = 2.09 x 10^-3 m^3

The force on an object is equal to the weight of displaced fluid. If the sphere is half-submerged, we can find the displaced volume of fluid and then its weight.

so ρgV = mg which implies that ρV = m therefore

mass of the sphere = (800 kg/m^3)(2.09 x 10^-3 m^3)= 1.68 kg

Then V of the sphere, actually the volume of the mass in the sphere so now we take
(4 pi / 3) * (outer radius^3- inner radius^3 ) = (4 pi / 3) * (0.1^3 )-(0.09)^3) = 1.135 x 10^-3 m^3

ρ= 1.68 kg / 1.135 x 10^-3 m^3 = 1479 kg/m^3 ?

This is what I worked out but I'm a little unsure regarding the volumes I've taken?

For part b, I'd take the volume with just the outer radius then I'd use
ρgV=mg so ρV=m where V is the volume I just calculated and m is the mass of the sphere from the previous part and solve for ρ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Taniaz said:
ρ= 1.68 kg / 1.135 x 10^-3 m^3 = 1479 kg/m^3 ?

This is what I worked out but I'm a little unsure regarding the volumes I've taken?
Looks good to me.

For part b, I'd take the volume with just the outer radius then I'd use
ρgV=mg so ρV=m where V is the volume I just calculated and m is the mass of the sphere from the previous part and solve for ρ?
Yes.
 
Great thank you! Can I ask another question?
A tank containing water is placed on a spring scale, which registers a total weight W. A stone of weight W is hung from a string and lowered into the water without touching the sides or bottom of the tank. What will be the reading on the spring scale in terms of W and the buoyancy B?(Assume the buoyancy on the stone is B<W).

I didn't get what he meant by placed "on" a spring scale? Isn't a spring scale just a Newton meter so it's supposed to be hung from it? Secondly, do we consider tension of the string here? Doesn't say if it's massless or not? B= W of beaker and water + W of stone or will it be T + B = W+W and T= 2W-B which would be the reading on the spring scale? It doesn't work if they actually mean a kitchen scale :/
 
Taniaz said:
This is what I worked out but I'm a little unsure regarding the volumes I've taken?
I didn't check your arithmetic, but your methods are correct.

Taniaz said:
For part b, I'd take the volume with just the outer radius then I'd use
ρgV=mg so ρV=m where V is the volume I just calculated and m is the mass of the sphere from the previous part and solve for ρ?
Sure, but you should not have to do any real calculation. (By what factor does V increase?)

Edit: I see TSny beat me to it while I was getting coffee ;)
 
It increases by twice the amount! There's another question in post 3 if you're willing to try? :smile:
 
Taniaz said:
It increases by twice the amount!
Right! So how must the density change?
 
Half the amount since they're inversely proportional since the mass is constant
 
Taniaz said:
Half the amount since they're inversely proportional since the mass is constant
Good.
 
Taniaz said:
I didn't get what he meant by placed "on" a spring scale? Isn't a spring scale just a Newton meter so it's supposed to be hung from it?
There are several types of "spring scales". Just think of it as a kitchen scale.

Taniaz said:
Secondly, do we consider tension of the string here?
I would.

Analyze it similarly to the "block hanging from a cord" problem. Do a force analysis of the stone. And then a force analysis of the "system" (Beaker + Water + stone).
 
  • #10
There's going to be Tension, the buoyant force and the weight on the stone so T + B = W
and on the beaker, water and stone there will be tension, weight, buoyant force, and the forceby the spring scale on the beaker so T+B+N=W+W?
 
  • #11
Taniaz said:
There's going to be Tension, the buoyant force and the weight on the stone so T + B = W
Good.

Taniaz said:
and on the beaker, water and stone there will be tension, weight, buoyant force, and the forceby the spring scale on the beaker so T+B+N=W+W?
Not exactly. Realize that the buoyant force is the water pushing up on the stone, which will be balanced by the force of the stone pushing down on the water. (That's Newton's 3rd law.)

Just include external forces on the system in your analysis.
 
  • #12
Ohh right, so it will just be T+N = W+W. We're looking to solve for N
Then if T+B=W so T=W-B then
(W-B) +N = 2W so
N = W + B?
 
  • #13
Taniaz said:
Ohh right, so it will just be T+N = W+W. We're looking to solve for N
Then if T+B=W so T=W-B then
(W-B) +N = 2W so
N = W + B?
Looks good!

Now that should make some intuitive sense (after awhile). Before the stone was lowered into the water, the scale just read W. And when you lower the stone, the stone pushes down onto the water (and thus the scale) with a force equal to the buoyant force, thus increasing the scale reading by that much.

But it's better to systematically analyze things, as you did, rather than rely on intuition. (Until you've done hundreds of problems.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vibhor
  • #14
Yes that makes sense.
Thank you for your help! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
696
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K