Holographic Principle: Quantum Gravity & String Theory

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the holographic principle, particularly its implications in quantum gravity and string theory. Participants explore its theoretical foundations, its relationship with black hole entropy, and the potential need for experimental validation. The conversation includes questions about the universality of the principle across different theories and its mathematical formulation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the holographic principle is a property of all quantum gravity theories.
  • There is uncertainty regarding whether all string theorists accept the holographic principle as a property of string theory, with specific mention of figures like Susskind and t'Hooft.
  • One participant notes that the basis for the holographic principle is linked to black hole entropy being dependent on area rather than volume, raising questions about its justification as a property of string theory.
  • Another participant suggests that the holographic principle may be a manifestation of locality of interaction, with entanglement entropy following an area law rather than a volume law.
  • It is mentioned that the AdS/CFT correspondence serves as a conjectural framework for the holographic principle, but lacks rigorous mathematical proof.
  • Some participants highlight the potential applications of the holographic principle in describing strong interactions, such as quark-gluon plasma in heavy-ion colliders.
  • There are references to variational approaches in finding ground states that align with the characteristics of the holographic principle, including mentions of DMRG and MERA techniques.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the universality and implications of the holographic principle, and the discussion remains unresolved on several key questions.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the strict mathematical formulation of the holographic principle and its dependence on specific theories, as well as the lack of consensus on the acceptance of the principle among all theorists.

dpa
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
Hi All,
:smile:
scr=wikipedia
The holographic principle is a property of quantum gravity and string theories which states that the description of a volume of space can be thought of as encoded on a boundary to the region

1. Is it a property of all quantum gravity theories?
2. Do all string theorists and not just Susskind, Maldacena, t'Hooft, believe HP to be property of string theory?
3. As most prominent basis for Holographic Principle is associated with dependence of Black Hole Entropy on area and not volume, is just that much fact justifiable to include it as property of string theory?
:confused:
Thanks DPA
 
Physics news on Phys.org
:confused:
:frown:
:devil:
 
Holographic Principle suggests that matter, space and time are the product of the non-material information. Such a vision needs a new approach in the physics. This change needs also experimental justification and a proper interpretation of the experiments.
 
The holographic principle manifests itself in string theory in the form of the so-called "AdS/CFT-Correspondence". It was formulated in the late 90's by Juan Maldacena (hence it is also often called "Maldacena Conjecture") and it states a duality between a type IIB string theory on an AdS_5\times S_5 and an N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory (which is a conformal field theory, CFT) on the 4-dimensional boundary of the AdS geometry. It consists of some kind of mathematical dictionary which relates quantities (like correlation functions) on the string theory side ("bulk") to quantities on the CFT side ("boundary"). One should emphasize that this is just a conjecture, no rigorous mathematical proof exists so far, but its success has led to the point where most people accept it as a fact. One of its remarkable features is that it relates strong coupling on the boundary to weak coupling in the bulk, allowing for perturbative calculations. This is of great use for describing strong interactions: quark-gluon-plasma, as it appears in heavy-ion-colliders, is one of the main applications of modern holography.
 
dpa said:
1. Is it a property of all quantum gravity theories?

In it's strict mathematical formulation, it is restricted to string theory.

2. Do all string theorists and not just Susskind, Maldacena, t'Hooft, believe HP to be property of string theory?

I'm not sure about Susskind and t'Hooft, but Maldacena is the one who conjectured it.

3. As most prominent basis for Holographic Principle is associated with dependence of Black Hole Entropy on area and not volume, is just that much fact justifiable to include it as property of string theory?

The black hole entropy was derived without explicit use of string theory, and as such it can be seen as a manifestation of the holographic principle that is not part of the AdS/CFT conjecture.
 
More generally the holographic principle might (stress on might --- this is open research) be really just a manifestation of locality of interaction. In most theories, it can be shown that the entanglement of the ground state is short ranged, and the entanglement entropy follows an area law rather than volume law; this is in contrast to the generic field state which would have long-ranged entanglement and volume-scaling entropy. This suggests that one might employ a variational approach to finding the ground state by restricting attention to states with these characteristics; this is done (successively) in DMRG (where the states are matrix product states) and more generally one can use a more generic MERA (multi-scale entanglement renormalisation ansatz) which allows algebraic decay of correlations as found in relativistic or critical theories. Recasting the variational problem as a minimisation problem gives essentially another field theory, but on a different space; generically on critical (and relativistic theories) you'd expect that space to have the original space as a boundary and a new dimension representing the scale (possibly with some interesting inner topology to account for phase transitions).

The only case where all this is worked out is in the canonical AdS/CFT correspondence of a particular string theory and (supersymmetric) Yang-Mills theory. But various hints exist (e.g. Ising models, Fermi/Luttinger liquids in low dimensions) that it should hold more generally.

If memory serves, PhysicsMonkey should have very intelligent things to say about all this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K