Holomorphic function help with checking the solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stephen88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the holomorphic nature of the function f(z) = z^2 * conjugate(z) in the complex plane. Participants are examining the conditions under which this function is complex-differentiable, particularly focusing on the application of the Cauchy-Riemann equations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to apply the Cauchy-Riemann equations to determine the differentiability of the function. There are discussions about the correctness of partial derivatives and the identification of real and imaginary components of the function.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes attempts to clarify misunderstandings regarding the Cauchy-Riemann equations and the implications of satisfying or not satisfying these conditions. Some participants are questioning the accuracy of the derived equations and exploring the implications of their findings.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of typographical errors in the equations presented, which may affect the analysis. Participants are also navigating the complexities of the function's behavior at specific points in the complex plane.

Stephen88
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm sorry in advance but this will contain a lot of words to describe the soluton as I"m not good with Latex.

z_=conjugate
Show that f(z) = z^2 * z_ is not holomorphic in C. At which points is it
complex-differentiable?
I think I solved the problem I"m just looking for a second view.(or multiples).


Homework Equations


Cauchy–Riemann equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok first I wrote f(z)=z*z*z_=z*|z^2|=(x+yi)(x^2+y^2)
Using the first Cauchy–Riemann equation and calculating the partial diff with respect to x of the real part then calculating the partial diff with respect to y for the imaginary part I get:
2x^2+y^2=3yi+ix^2,this is not holomorphic but is complex diff at x=y=0.
Is this correct?If not what should I do.(if you can provide answer with examples,or at least detailed, that with be great)
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your conclusion is right, but the partial derivatives are wrong and there is no 'i' in the Cauchy-Riemann equations. What are u(x,y) and v(x,y)? Try and clean that up.
 
...f(z)=x^3 +x*y^2+i(y*x^2+y^3).
u(x,y)=x^3 +x*y^2
v(x,y)=i(y*x^2+y^3)

C-R=>2x^2+y^2=3y^2+x^2...this is equal for x=y=0...
Is there anything else I should do?
 
Stephen88 said:
...f(z)=x^3 +x*y^2+i(y*x^2+y^3).
u(x,y)=x^3 +x*y^2
v(x,y)=i(y*x^2+y^3)

C-R=>2x^2+y^2=3y^2+x^2...this is equal for x=y=0...
Is there anything else I should do?

v(x,y)=y*x^2+u^3. There is no 'i' in v(x,y). There are two C-R equations. I assume you are doing u_x=v_y. If so your x partial derivative of u(x,y) is still wrong.
 
sorry about that, typo mistake...3x^2+y^2=3y^2+x^2...for any x=y I assume
 
Stephen88 said:
sorry about that, typo mistake...3x^2+y^2=3y^2+x^2...for any x=y I assume

Yes, any x=y works. x=(-y) also works. But you aren't using the other CR equation.
 
I can but if one of the C-R eq is not satisfied then the holomorphic part is done...
 
Stephen88 said:
I can but if one of the C-R eq is not satisfied then the holomorphic part is done...

True. But there are lots of solutions of the CR equation you just wrote down. That doesn't mean there are lots of points where the function has a complex derivative.
 
Last edited:
Understood.Thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K