Homeomorphism calculation help

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on demonstrating that the set of matrices in GL(n;R) with positive determinants is homeomorphic to the set with negative determinants. A proposed method involves replacing the first row of a matrix with its negative, which could serve as an explicit homeomorphism. This transformation maintains the structure of the matrices while changing the sign of the determinant. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the properties of determinants in relation to homeomorphism. The proposed approach highlights a practical technique for establishing the desired homeomorphic relationship.
rifat
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
How can we show that the set {A in GL(n;R) | det(A)>0} is homeomorphic to the set {A in GL(n;R) | det(A)<0}?"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you think of A as a matrix, how about just replacing the first row with the negative of itself? Isn't that an explicit homeomorphism?
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K