Homework Problem about the Work-Energy Theorem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem related to the Work-Energy Theorem, specifically involving a puck on a shuffleboard that slows down due to friction. The original poster is trying to determine the coefficient of kinetic friction given the initial and final speeds and the distance traveled.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts various equations related to work and energy but struggles due to the lack of mass information. Other participants suggest using kinematic equations and the relationship between friction and normal force to derive the coefficient of kinetic friction.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problem using established equations. There is acknowledgment that the mass of the puck is not needed for the final calculation due to cancellation in the equations. The discussion appears to be moving towards a resolution, with some participants confirming calculations.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses confusion about the problem setup and the necessary equations, indicating a learning context where foundational understanding is being developed.

aquamarine08
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Homework Problem about the Work-Energy Theorem

Please help! This is my first year of taking physics and I am really confused...

A puck on a shuffleboard decreases in speed from 1.0 m/s to .20 m/s while traveling 4.0 m. What is the coeffecient of kinetic friction between the puck and the board?



I think that the equations we have to use to solve this would be...


w= [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]m[tex]V_{1}^{2}[/tex]-[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]m[tex]V_{o}^{2}[/tex]

w=Fd

[tex]F_{f}[/tex]=[tex]\mu[/tex][tex]F_{N}[/tex]

w = [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]k[tex]d^{2}[/tex]

k= [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]m[tex]V^{2}[/tex]


First : I was thinking about using the equation w= [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]m[tex]V_{1}^{2}[/tex]-[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]m[tex]V_{o}^{2}[/tex] to solve for work, then substitute the work value in for w=Fd then somehow put it in the equation [tex]F_{f}[/tex]=[tex]\mu[/tex][tex]F_{N}[/tex] . Then I got extremely confused...and I realized that I don't have the mass of the puck to put into the first equation.

Second try: So, I decided to use w = [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]k[tex]d^{2}[/tex] but in order to find out the k (spring constant) value, I need to use the equation k= [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]m[tex]V^{2}[/tex]...which again, I don't have the mass for.

Third try...I was going to use the equation F=kd to figure out F and then substitute it in for w in w=Fd and then solve for m in w= [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]m[tex]V_{1}^{2}[/tex]-[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]m[tex]V_{o}^{2}[/tex]
. But I don't have the k again!

And now, I'm out of ideas...please help me...thank you! :) I hope this question makes sense...and my tries...if not, let me know and I'll try to fix them up! Thanks again!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Find the retardation of the body by using kinematic equatuon. Retarding force = m*a and normal reaction = mg. Plug it in the equation to get coefficient kinetic friction
 
Try this

Force of friction is given by:

[tex]F_{f}[/tex] = [tex]\mu[/tex] N [1]

Solving for [tex]\mu[/tex] we have

[tex]\mu[/tex] = [tex]\frac{F_{f}}{N}[/tex] [2]

The normal force N is given by:

N = mg [3]

Substituting [3] into [2] we have:

[tex]\mu[/tex] = [tex]\frac{F_{f}}{mg}[/tex] [4]

The force of friction is also defined by:

[tex]F_{f}[/tex] = ma [5]

where a is the deceleration and m is the mass of the puck. We also know given a distance and a constant acceleration (or deceleration in this case) that the acceleration is equal to the following (see: http://library.thinkquest.org/10796/ch3/ch3.htm ):

a = [tex]\frac{(V_{f}^{2} - V_{i}^{2})}{2d}[/tex] [6]

Substituting [6] into [5] we have:

[tex]F_{f}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{m(V_{f}^{2} - V_{i}^{2})}{2d}[/tex] [7]

and finally substituting [7] into [4] we have:

[tex]\mu[/tex] = [tex]\frac{(V_{f}^{2} - V_{i}^{2})}{2dg}[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
photonsquared, I used your method to solve the problem...it made sense to me and this is the answer that I got [tex]\mu_{k}[/tex]= .0122. Is there anyway you could tell me if this is correct? Thank you very much for your help! :smile:
 
That is the same value I calculate. The reason you don't need the mass of the puck is because the masses cancel out when you substitute eqn 7 into 4. Hope this helps.
 
Ok thank you very much photonsquared! :) Thanks rl.bhat for your response!
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K