Hooke's law - addition of force constant

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the relationship between the force constants of two springs connected in series, specifically how to derive the equation 1/ktot = 1/k1 + 1/k2. Participants are exploring the implications of Hooke's law in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to manipulate equations related to Hooke's law to derive the total spring constant. Some participants suggest solving for one variable in terms of another and substituting it into the equations. Others raise questions about the physical interpretation of spring constants when springs of different lengths are involved.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering guidance on how to approach the derivation and discussing the physical principles behind the behavior of springs. There appears to be a productive exchange of ideas, though no consensus has been reached on the final derivation.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference previous discussions about spring constants and material properties, indicating a broader context of inquiry into the mechanics of springs and their behavior under different conditions.

ys2050
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I need to figure out an equation that shows the relationship between the force constants of two springs that are connected together.
I know that the 1/ktot = 1/k1 + 1/k2
but I have to shows all the steps to obtain this equation...
I know that
F = k1x1 = k2x2 = k(x1 + x2)
I tried manipulating the equation to get the expression I want but i don't seem to be getting it... :(
Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's not 'the' equation. That's two equations. Solve k1*x1=k2*x2 for x2. Put that into k1*x1=k*(x1+x2). Cancel the common factor of x1 and solve for k in terms of k1 and k2.
 
Good point. You are probably asking why, for example, if I hook two springs with spring constant k together, the resulting spring constant is k/2? Because to get to a given displacement, each spring has to stretch only half as far. The material properties didn't change. Imagine two springs made of the same stuff, one 1m long and the other 2m long. It really is easier to stretch the long spring by an extra meter than the short spring.
 
Hey, this is just like a couple of other questions asked about the spring constant of a wire last night. If the bulk modulus of the material is M, then the spring constant of a wire is k=M*A/L, where A is the cross sectional area and L is the length. Double L and you halve k.
 
Dick said:
Good point. You are probably asking why, for example, if I hook two springs with spring constant k together, the resulting spring constant is k/2? Because to get to a given displacement, each spring has to stretch only half as far. The material properties didn't change. Imagine two springs made of the same stuff, one 1m long and the other 2m long. It really is easier to stretch the long spring by an extra meter than the short spring.

hmmm I'm not sure if I'm getting it...
so in my case, the total spring did not have to exert as much force in order for the spring to get to a certain distant because...?? :confused:
 
Because the 2m spring has to flex the material less when stretched by one meter than the 1m spring, if you want to put it that way. Your derivation is correct. If you have access to stuff, hook two springs together and measure. You'll see you were right.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K