Horizontal Motion with Quadratic Drag

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of an object moving horizontally under the influence of a quadratic drag force, specifically analyzing the application of Newton's second law and the integration of the resulting differential equation to find the velocity as a function of time.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the formulation of Newton's second law for the object and the separation of variables to solve for velocity. There are attempts to integrate the equation, with some participants questioning the correctness of their integration steps and the resulting expressions.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided guidance on integration techniques and have pointed out potential errors in the original poster's approach. There is an ongoing exploration of different methods to integrate the equation, with no explicit consensus reached on the final form of the solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. There is a focus on ensuring that the velocity function behaves appropriately as time progresses, particularly in the context of large time limits.

Lonely Lemon
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider an object that is coasting horizontally (positive x direction) subject to a drag force f = -bv - cv^2 . Write down Newton's second law for this object and solve for v by separating variables. Sketc the behaviour of v as a function of t. Explain the time dependence for t large. (Which force term is dominant when t is large?)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I start with Newton's second law:

m(dv/dt) = -bv -cv^2

m(dv/dt) = -v(cv + b)

(-m/v)(dv/dt) -cv = b

dv/v + (cv/m)dt = (-b/m)dt

Then... do I integrate with respect to v for the dv terms and t for the dt terms? I can't figure out what this will give me with the second term on the right...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need all the 'v' terms together with 'dv'. But you subtracted 'cv' in line 3 which is a mistake. Instead divide the whole equation in line 2 by 'v(cv+b)'. Then solve for it.
 
I get to the point where all my v terms are on one side so that I have:

(m dv)/[v(cv+b)] = -dt

From here when I try and integrate with respect to v on the left and t on the right, I'm doing a definite integral setting the limits between v and v0 and t and t0 so I get:

m[ln(cv^2 + bv) - ln(cv0^2 - bv0^2)] = -t

ln(cv^2 + bv) = -t/m + ln(cv0^2 - bv0^2)

Then if I take the exponential of both sides I still end up in a situation where I can't solve for v because there will be v on both sides... i.e

cv^2 + bv = e^(-t/m) + cv0^2 - bv0^2

How can I solve this for v?
 
You need to check your integration, it is incorrect.
 
How exactly do I integrate m(dv)/[v(cv+b)] ? The way I do it I consistently get natural log expressions which I am guessing is wrong because the function should tend towards 0 when I plot it...
 
Lonely Lemon said:
How exactly do I integrate m(dv)/[v(cv+b)] ? The way I do it I consistently get natural log expressions which I am guessing is wrong because the function should tend towards 0 when I plot it...

\frac{d}{dv}\ln|cv^2+bv|=\frac{2cv+b}{cv^2+bv}\neq\frac{1}{cv^2+bv}

To integrate your expression properly, try completing the square on the denominator and then making an appropriate substitution.
 
Another trick is to break the fraction up into to fractions that look like this:

\frac{1}{v(cv+b)} = \frac{A}{v} + \frac{B}{cv+b}

Then solve for A and B. Integrating the two fractions separately will be much easier.
 
Ah that clears things up. I see where I went wrong there, thanks for your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
4K