Theoretical Mechanics: velocity dependent force

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a projectile launched horizontally with a velocity-dependent retarding force described by the equation F = -Ae^(cv). Participants are tasked with finding the speed of the projectile as a function of time, using the fundamental relationship F = ma.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to integrate the motion equation and arrives at a solution for the final velocity. They express confusion over a discrepancy with an online source that provides a different expression for final velocity. Other participants question the correctness of the signs in the equations and suggest factoring techniques to reconcile the differences.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring the implications of different signs in the equations and considering how these affect the conclusions about the projectile's motion. Some participants suggest that the original poster's approach may be correct, while others propose that the alternative solution might contain a sign error. There is a collaborative effort to clarify the mathematical steps involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the differing equations lead to different conclusions regarding the projectile's travel time and final velocity, raising questions about the assumptions made in each approach. The discussion reflects a careful examination of the mathematical properties of logarithmic functions and their implications in the context of the problem.

PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


A projectile is launched horizontally. A retarding force acts on the projectile of the form F = -Ae^(cv). Find it's speed as function of time.


Homework Equations


F = ma


The Attempt at a Solution



m(dv/dt) = -Ae^(cv)

e^(-cv) dv = (-A/m) dt

I integrated the left side between intitial velocity and final velocity, (v_i and v_f) and the right side between 0 and t. After evaluating the elementary integral and doing a small amount of algebra we come to the following:

e^(-c*v_f) = (t*A*c)/m + e^(-c*v_i)

taking the natural log of both sides...

-c*v_f = ln ((t*A*c)/m + e^(-c*v_i))

so...

v_f = (-1/c) ln((t*A*c)/m + e^(-c*v_i))

which is what I wrote for my answer. Hurray. Except an online source that is pretty dependable gives a different solution. They have the following:

v_f = v_i - (1/c)*ln(1+(A*c*t*e^(-c*v_i)/m))

Anyone want to shed some light on my mistake or tell me my other source is incorrect?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PsychonautQQ said:
so...

v_f = (-1/c) ln((t*A*c)/m + e^(-c*v_i))

which is what I wrote for my answer. Hurray. Except an online source that is pretty dependable gives a different solution. They have the following:

v_f = v_i - (1/c)*ln(1+(A*c*t*e^(-c*v_i)/m))

Are you sure that the negative sign in their answer (shown in red) is correct?

Try the following in your answer. Factor out e^(-c*v_i) from the entire argument of your log function. Then see if you can get your answer to reduce to theirs.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Seeing as how much log function takes the form of ln(1+ce^(-cv)) is there even a way to factor it out? Also i'll recheck my work and see if the minus sign is out of place. Did you get the same answer as me but with a positive sign? I'm pretty sure they are different answers though because they lead to different conclusions about certain aspects of the objects motion, for example how long it is traveling for. To solve for the time just said v_f equal to zero and solve for t, my equation and their equation seem to give separate results.
 
I think your answer is correct, but "their" answer has the wrong sign in the exponential part.

Suppose you write the argument of your ln function as (t*A*c)/m + e-c*vi = e-c*vi [e+c*vi(t*A*c)/m + 1]. Then use properties of the ln function to simplify.
 
PsychonautQQ said:
Seeing as how much log function takes the form of ln(1+ce^(-cv)) is there even a way to factor it out? Also i'll recheck my work and see if the minus sign is out of place. Did you get the same answer as me but with a positive sign? I'm pretty sure they are different answers though because they lead to different conclusions about certain aspects of the objects motion, for example how long it is traveling for. To solve for the time just said v_f equal to zero and solve for t, my equation and their equation seem to give separate results.

TSny is correct, there must be a sign mistake in the answer they give. With that modification, your answer is the same as theirs which can be shown using the hint given by TSny.

It is clear that you're a sneer is correct and the form they wrote is incorrect because we can look at the limit of an infinite force by taking the limit ## c \rightarrow \infty ##. Your answer gives v_f =0 whereas their original answer would give v_f = v_i.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
895
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K