Horizontally mounted compression spring

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the use of horizontally mounted compression springs for a swinging component that experiences varying forces. The user requires two compression springs that compress 2.5 inches at 300 lbs and 8 inches at 3,200 lbs, while avoiding custom solutions. Suggestions include exploring both progressive rate springs and standard springs to achieve the desired elastic constant. The user also plans to incorporate a hydraulic rod to manage oscillation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of compression spring mechanics
  • Knowledge of spring rates and force calculations
  • Familiarity with hydraulic systems and their applications
  • Experience in sourcing mechanical components
NEXT STEPS
  • Research compression spring specifications and manufacturers
  • Learn about calculating spring rates for varying loads
  • Investigate the benefits of progressive rate springs in dynamic applications
  • Explore hydraulic rod designs for oscillating systems
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, product designers, and anyone involved in the design of dynamic systems requiring precise force control.

Battisto
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am working on a swinging component. The component can swing with a varying amount of forces, which I need to control. I can not use an extension spring, because the widely varying amounts of force. I am hopeful that I will be able to use a pair of compression springs, yet I would need them to be mounted horizontally. I would mount two springs; one on each side. At rest the compression springs would have no force on them. I would need the pair of springs to compress approximately 2.5 inches each at 300 lbs of force. I would need them to compress 8 inches each at 3,200 lbs of force. There would be forces in between as well. I am having trouble understanding if this would be possible and functional, and being able to find springs that fit this criterion. I would like to find them stock as well, avoiding custom. I thought progressive rate springs might be benificial for such an application? I would mount a hydraulic rod behind the swing to accommodate the oscillation. Any suggestions and/or advice would be appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Battisto said:
I am working on a swinging component. The component can swing with a varying amount of forces, which I need to control. I can not use an extension spring, because the widely varying amounts of force. I am hopeful that I will be able to use a pair of compression springs, yet I would need them to be mounted horizontally. I would mount two springs; one on each side. At rest the compression springs would have no force on them. I would need the pair of springs to compress approximately 2.5 inches each at 300 lbs of force. I would need them to compress 8 inches each at 3,200 lbs of force. There would be forces in between as well. I am having trouble understanding if this would be possible and functional, and being able to find springs that fit this criterion. I would like to find them stock as well, avoiding custom. I thought progressive rate springs might be benificial for such an application? I would mount a hydraulic rod behind the swing to accommodate the oscillation. Any suggestions and/or advice would be appreciated.

Welcome to PF.

It is hard for me to understand the swinging component. Somethng like a car's suspension maybe? What is it that you need those springs for?

If you need springs there are many options. Google the net for a spring of your spec., the offer is very wide. Plus you can add two different springs (preferably on same shaft) to achieve needed elastic constant. You can play with both progressive rate and standard for different effects.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K