How accurate is the square root of a number?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The square root of numbers such as 2, 3, and 5 cannot be defined to the last decimal point due to their nature as irrational numbers, which have infinite, non-repeating decimal representations. Calculators utilize algorithms to compute these square roots to a specified number of decimal places, but the concept of "measurement" in this context is misleading. Instead, these values are calculated, and while they can be represented to many digits, they are inherently infinite and cannot be fully known. Thus, the square root of 2, for example, is not undefined but rather represents an infinite string of digits.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of irrational numbers
  • Familiarity with mathematical algorithms
  • Basic knowledge of decimal representation
  • Experience with calculators and their functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research algorithms for calculating square roots, such as the Newton-Raphson method
  • Explore the concept of irrational numbers in depth
  • Learn about numerical precision and limits in computational mathematics
  • Investigate the differences between rational and irrational decimal expansions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students, and anyone interested in the properties of numbers and computational methods for calculating square roots.

christian0710
Messages
407
Reaction score
8
This may sound like a silly question but: How accurately has the squareroot of numbers like 2,3,5 etc. been measured?
When you type it into a calculator it gives you an answer with a certain amount of decimal points,
the calculator is of course software programmed by a group of people who can't possibly
know the square root of 2 to the last descimal point, so is it
correctly assumed that you will never be able to define the square root of a number like 2,3,5 to the last
decimal point because the number of descimal points of 2,3,5 goes to infinity?
So the square root of 2 is undefined to the last descimal point.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You are correct. The square root of some numbers is an infinite string of digits and thus literally cannot be known to "full" precision. It isn't something that is, as you stated, "measured", it is calculated and it can be calculated to as many digits as you wish but that's a waste of time.
 
These questions don't really make sense in a mathematical context - in maths we don't "measure" anything in the sense you are using the word.

A calculator is programmed with an algorithm that can calculate a representation of √2 to as many decimal places as you want, so we do not say that anything is undefined, however unlike 1/3 = 0.333... or 1/7 = 0.142857142857... whose decimal representation also "goes to infinity" there is no pattern to these digits: we use the word irrational to describe such a number.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K