How Are Circular Permutations of Indistinguishable Objects Calculated?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating circular permutations of m+n indistinguishable objects, where m objects are alike and n objects are of a different kind but also alike. The initial approach suggested fixing one object and calculating arrangements, leading to a formula that incorrectly includes duplicate arrangements. A counterexample with m=n=2 demonstrates that the formula overcounts arrangements by including duplicates like ABBA. Participants emphasize the need to generalize the result without fixing m or n, highlighting the complexity of the problem as m and n increase. The conversation revolves around refining the approach to accurately count distinct circular arrangements.
ritwik06
Messages
577
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the number of arrangements possible for arranging m+n things in a circular orientation, such that m things are alike and th other n things are also alike but of diffrent kind as from the first category.

Attempt:
I fix one thing. I am left with m+n-1
So the number of arrangements should be= \frac{(m+n-1)!}{(m-1)!n!}
what is wrong with this approach?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ritwik06 said:
Find the number of arrangements possible for arranging m+n things in a circular orientation, such that m things are alike and th other n things are also alike but of diffrent kind as from the first category.

I fix one thing. I am left with m+n-1
So the number of arrangements should be= \frac{(m+n-1)!}{(m-1)!n!}
what is wrong with this approach?

Hi ritwik06! :smile:

Hint: if m = n = 2, there are only two possible arrangements … AABB and ABAB, but your formula gives 3!/2! = 3, because it includes ABBA.

Can you see why that's wrong, and how to deal with it? :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi ritwik06! :smile:

Hint: if m = n = 2, there are only two possible arrangements … AABB and ABAB, but your formula gives 3!/2! = 3, because it includes ABBA.

Can you see why that's wrong, and how to deal with it? :wink:

Yeah, Thats wrong.
So what should I do know? How can I check?? Is it only one arrangement that repeats itself?? Or Are there more? How can I find out? Making possible cases is easy when m,n are small but hen they are big its difficult. Help me please.
 
ritwik06 said:
Yeah, Thats wrong.
So what should I do know? How can I check?? Is it only one arrangement that repeats itself?? Or Are there more? How can I find out? Making possible cases is easy when m,n are small but hen they are big its difficult. Help me please.

Come on … think! :smile:

ABBA is wrong because … ? :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Come on … think! :smile:

ABBA is wrong because … ? :wink:

Its wrong because its the same as AABB...
But still, I want to generalise the result not by fixing m or n :eek:
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K