How are correlation functions defined for non-uniform operator theories?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter UndeadCat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the definition of correlation functions, specifically Green's functions, in non-uniform operator theories as utilized in the LSZ reduction formula. The correlation functions are defined in two equivalent ways, involving time-ordering operators and the scattering matrix, as detailed in David Tong's lecture notes. The conversation highlights the need for clarity when defining correlation functions for theories with different operators, suggesting that the notation G(n,m) may be appropriate for multiple field types. Resources such as Srednicki's chapters 5-10 are recommended for further understanding of these concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Green's functions in quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with the LSZ reduction formula
  • Knowledge of time-ordering operators and scattering matrices
  • Basic concepts of Feynman graphs and their connectedness
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Srednicki's chapters 5-10 on quantum field theory for insights into scattering amplitudes
  • Explore the implications of different field operators in correlation functions
  • Investigate the calculation of correlation functions in non-uniform operator theories
  • Review problem 9.5 from Srednicki's text for practical applications of the LSZ formula
USEFUL FOR

Quantum field theorists, physicists studying scattering processes, and students seeking to deepen their understanding of correlation functions in non-uniform operator theories.

UndeadCat
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi all, this is a question about Green's functions (sometimes called correlation functions), used in the LSZ reduction formula. They are defined in section 3.7 of http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/qft/three.pdf in two different (but equivalent) ways:
G(n)(x1, x2...xn):= <\Omega|T{\Phi1H\Phi2H...\PhinH}|\Omega> = <0|T{\Phi1\Phi2...\Phin}S|0>/<0|S|0> = sum of all connected Feynman graphs (where |\Omega> is the true vacuum of the interacting theory, normalized to H|\Omega> = 0; \PhinH = \Phi(xn) in the Heisenberg picture; T is the time-ordering operator and S is the scattering matrix). The link above has a very nice proof that these are all equivalent, but my question is: how, then, does one define the correlation functions for a theory where NOT all the operators are the same? At a guess, it would be defined as the above with a different choice of field operators as each combination for the LSZ formula requires...can anyone verify this or else tell me how such objects are calculated or where I can find out more?
Also, if anyone can point me in the direction of some resources where some of the phenomena mentioned related to Green's functions are calculated?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello

I am not totally sure I understood your question, and I couldn't access the link you posted (although I did take that course by David Tong, once upon a time!)

In general the greens / correlation functions used in the LSZ formula can involve different fields operators. I think Srednicki chapters 5-10 give a nice walkthrough from the LSZ formula to scattering amplitudes ( don't panic, very short chapters and available online : http://web.physics.ucsb.edu/~mark/qft.html ).

You may find problem 9.5 particularly illuminating. It doesn't need path integrals, so may be more in line with Tong's treatment.
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure but I would guess you'd would have something like this:
G(n,m)(x1, x2...xn ,y1, y2...ym) instead of
G(n)(x1, x2...xn)

in the single field case you have to specify the number of fields and in the two field case you specify the number of both fields. not sure if I answered your question
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K