Which operator corresponds to the Green function in QFT?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on identifying the operator that corresponds to the Green function in quantum field theory (QFT), particularly in the context of the two-point correlation function of a field operator. The scope includes theoretical considerations and the implications of interacting versus non-interacting fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that the Feynman propagator is the Green's function of the operator $(\Box + m^2)$, leading to a question about the operator corresponding to the two-point function $<\Omega |T\{\phi(x) \phi(y)\}|\Omega>$.
  • Another participant argues that if $\phi(x)$ is a non-free interacting field, it satisfies a nonlinear equation, suggesting that no linear operator can satisfy the original requirement.
  • Some participants note that even if the operator is nonlinear, it may still be possible to discuss the Green's function in a broader sense, although this may be considered an abuse of language.
  • There is a suggestion that all Green's functions are inverses of the same operator but with different boundary conditions, which raises further questions about the nature of these conditions.
  • One participant references Schwinger's work, indicating that he defines an operator $G$ related to the Green function for specific equations, but it remains unclear whether this corresponds to free or full-perturbative equations.
  • A later reply mentions that exact solutions to the operator $G$ can be found for free particles and particles under classical electromagnetic fields, suggesting limitations in non-perturbative approaches.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether a linear operator can be associated with the Green function in the case of interacting fields. There is no consensus on the nature of the operator or the validity of calling certain functions Green's functions when they arise from nonlinear equations.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexities of defining operators in the context of interacting fields and the implications of boundary conditions on Green's functions. There are unresolved questions regarding the definitions and applicability of these concepts in QFT.

jordi
Messages
197
Reaction score
14
The Feynman propagator:

$$D_{F}(x,y) = <0|T\{\phi_{0}(x) \phi_{0}(y)\}|0> $$

is the Green's function of the operator (except maybe for a constant):

$$ (\Box + m^2)$$

In other words:

$$ (\Box + m^2) D_{F}(x,y) = - i \hbar \delta^{4}(x-y)$$

My question is:

Which is the operator that corresponds to:

$$<\Omega |T\{\phi(x) \phi(y)\}|\Omega> $$

being the Green's function (understood as "operator times Green's function equals to delta") in QFT?

I assume that the answer to my question has something to do with the Schwinger-Dyson equations, but I cannot find it out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If ##\phi(x)## is a non-free interacting field, then it satisfies a nonlinear equation, e.g. ##(\Box+m^2)\phi(x)+\lambda\phi^3(x)=0##. Hence there is no linear operator that would satisfy your requirement.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jordi
Demystifier said:
If ##\phi(x)## is a non-free interacting field, then it satisfies a nonlinear equation, e.g. ##(\Box+m^2)\phi(x)+\lambda\phi^3(x)=0##. Hence there is no linear operator that would satisfy your requirement.
In QFT, this equation is ill-defined.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jordi
Demystifier said:
If ##\phi(x)## is a non-free interacting field, then it satisfies a nonlinear equation, e.g. ##(\Box+m^2)\phi(x)+\lambda\phi^3(x)=0##. Hence there is no linear operator that would satisfy your requirement.

It does not need to be linear, the operator could be non-linear.
 
Could one say that these functions are then correlations but not Green functions (except in the free case)?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
jordi said:
Could one say that these functions are then correlations but not Green functions (except in the free case)?

Pretty much. Sometimes people still call them "Green's functions" even though they satisfy a nonlinear equation like the one Demystifier gave, but this is an abuse of language since Green's functions are technically only defined for linear operators.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier and jordi
jordi said:
Which is the operator that corresponds to:
$$<\Omega |T\{\phi(x) \phi(y)\}|\Omega> $$
being the Green's function (understood as "operator times Green's function equals to delta") in QFT?
All Green's functions are inverses of the same operator, but with different bounday condiions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jordi
Can you please provide more background to your answer?
 
jordi said:
Can you please provide more background to your answer?
The boundary conditions depend on the complex integration path in the inversion formula. See here.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jordi
  • #10
Not sure if it is what you are asking for, but in "on gauge invariance and vacuum polarization" (1951) Schwinger defines and calculates an operator G with $$\left\langle x\right|G\left|x'\right\rangle =G(x,x')$$ where the right hand side is the Green's function of the corresponding equation (Dirac or Klein-Gordon).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and jordi
  • #11
Does it correspond to the free or to the "full-perturbative" equation?
 
  • #12
You can find the exact solutions to G in the case of the free particle and a particle under the effect of some "classical" electromagnetic field configurations. I think that's the best that can be done non-perturbatively.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K