B How are fractures in airplane structures detected by ultrasound?

Click For Summary
Ultrasound is used to detect fractures in airplane structures by reflecting sound waves at interfaces where there are changes in material properties. While ultrasound can travel through solids, it encounters difficulty exiting into air, leading to significant reflection at fractures. This reflection occurs due to differences in acoustic impedance between materials, which causes energy to be absorbed or reflected. The discussion clarifies that the assertion that ultrasound cannot travel through air after passing through solid is misleading; rather, most energy reflects back, indicating a crack's presence. Understanding acoustic impedance is crucial for effective ultrasonic testing in aviation.
pgirl1729
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
How does fractures in airplanes detected by ultrasound?
For applications of ultrasound, detecting fractures using ultrasound is listed in one of my textbooks. According to that, ultrasound cannot travel through air right after it travelled through solid parts of the plane. Therefore if there was a fracture, the sound was supposed to be reflected back. How does it happen exactly? I don't have much knowledge about it. Is it because solid has the ability to cope with the high frequency of ultrasound, but air doesn't? apparently making it go back?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes sandy stone, russ_watters and pgirl1729
I think the key reference in Baluncore's post is the one on acoustic impedance. Different materials have different impedances, and where there's a change you get some reflection.

So I think the OP's book is over-stating it when it says "ultrasound cannot travel through air right after it travelled through solid" (my bold). Actually, it's only difficult for sound to exit from the solid, but that does mean that very little energy travels into the air gap. The rest reflects, revealing the presence of the crack.
 
  • Like
Likes nasu, russ_watters and pgirl1729
Thread 'The rocket equation, one more time'
I already posted a similar thread a while ago, but this time I want to focus exclusively on one single point that is still not clear to me. I just came across this problem again in Modern Classical Mechanics by Helliwell and Sahakian. Their setup is exactly identical to the one that Taylor uses in Classical Mechanics: a rocket has mass m and velocity v at time t. At time ##t+\Delta t## it has (according to the textbooks) velocity ##v + \Delta v## and mass ##m+\Delta m##. Why not ##m -...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K