How are topologically separated graphs related in linear equations?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter trambolin
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of "topologically separated" graphs in relation to linear equations. Specifically, it examines two graphs, G1 and G2, defined by linear functions A and B, respectively. The key conclusion is that these graphs are topologically separated if their intersection is only at the origin, expressed mathematically as G1 ∩ G2^- = {0}. The distance between points on these graphs increases as one moves away from the origin, indicating that the slopes of A and B differ significantly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear functions and their graphical representations
  • Familiarity with basic topology concepts, including distance and separation
  • Knowledge of linear algebra, particularly matrix representation of linear equations
  • Experience with graph theory and intersections of sets
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of topological spaces and metrics in detail
  • Explore linear transformations and their graphical implications
  • Learn about the concept of graph intersections in higher dimensions
  • Investigate the implications of different slopes in linear functions on graph separation
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and researchers in graph theory who are exploring the relationships between linear equations and their graphical representations.

trambolin
Messages
341
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I am kind of blocked by the "topologically separated" phrase in the following sense. The reading comes to the paragpraph as such

"... Relations are topologically separated, loosely speaking, if the distance from points of one relation to the other grows without bound..."

Anyone can shed some light on this? Especially if we have two graphs :

[tex] \begin{array}{l}<br /> G_1 = \left\{ {\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}<br /> x \\<br /> y \\<br /> \end{array}} \right):x = Ay} \right\} \\ <br /> G_2^- = \left\{ {\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}<br /> x \\<br /> y \\<br /> \end{array}} \right):y = Bx} \right\} \\ <br /> \end{array}[/tex]

It is said that "bla bla bla ... if and only if the graph of A and the inverse graph of B are topologically separated i.e. [itex]G_1 \cap G_2^- = \{0\}[/itex]" Let's keep A,B linear for now. I don't get how come the two sentences are related in a topological sense.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
They are not related in a topological sense, as long as you do not define a topology. Or as in this case, a metric, since you talk about distances.

The little that can be said from the "loosely speaking is, that ##A## and ##B## in your example define linear functions of different slope, so that the points of the graphs get further apart the bigger the distance to ##(0,0)## is. Loosely questions can only get loosely answers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 146 ·
5
Replies
146
Views
12K