How Big is the Black Hole if Differential Acceleration is 10 m/s²?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a man hovering above a Schwarzschild black hole, with a focus on the differential acceleration experienced between his head and feet. The specific acceleration rate is given as 10 m/s², prompting questions about the relationship between this acceleration and the black hole's radius.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Newtonian equations in a relativistic context, questioning whether the problem is fundamentally a relativity issue. There is exploration of tidal forces and how to relate the differential acceleration to the black hole's properties.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some suggesting simultaneous equations as a potential approach. Others express uncertainty about the adequacy of the information provided and the methods being considered. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the use of derivatives and the equations involved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the potential inadequacy of using classical mechanics in a relativistic scenario, while others emphasize the need to clarify the assumptions regarding the forces acting on the man. The discussion reflects varying levels of confidence in the approaches being considered.

Sanjay87
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A man is hovering above a Schwarzschild black hole. He is 1 meter tall. What would be the radius of the black hole if the man's head is accelerating away from his feet at a rate of 10 m/s^2.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The force on the man would be equal to GMm/r^2, where M is the black hole mass and m is the man's mass and r is the Schwarzschild radius. This means the acceleration is GM/r^2 ... but I've hit a snag.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) the radius of the feet and head aren't the same. You are doing tidal forces here. 2) GMm/r^2 is not very relativistic. Is this really a relativity problem?
 
I wasn't certain where to post this question and this appeared to be the most appropriate. I can post it elsewhere, if you suggest. I did realize that it's a tidal forces problem, but I came into difficulties. The force at the man's feet is different from the force at his head, but I don't know how to take the next step.
 
Maybe I should ask you what snag or difficulty you hit? You have a (Newtonian) equation for the acceleration as a function of radius. So the inner radius is r and the outer radius is r+(1 m). Taking the difference and setting it equal to 10m/sec gives you an equation in M and r. If r is the Schwarzschild radius of a hole of mass M, you know another relation between M and r. Solve the two simultaneous equations. I would wonder if using GM/r^2 would be good enough, but if the differential acceleration is as small as 10m/sec, it probably is.
 
Last edited:
I did think about the simultaneous equations, and I also thought about differentiating with respect to r, but I'm not clear how to do it. I feel like there is not enough information, but there must be.
 
You can approximate the acceleration difference with a derivative if you wish. But you don't have to. You can still solve the system directly. So just do it. What did you get? There is no missing information.
 
Do you mean the following:

equation 1: GM/r - GM/(r+1) = 10
equation 2: 2GM/c^2 = r

Do you mean all I have to do is to solve these 2 equations? Then it's no problem.

How would I go about doing it with a derivative instead?
 
Hi again,

Thanks for the help. I found that doing it with a derivative makes it easier to do the simultaneous equations. I've solved it, and it was easier than I thought. Thanks again
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K