How big of a threat is North Korea?

  • Thread starter Thread starter QuantumTheory
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
North Korea has declared its possession of nuclear weapons for self-defense, raising concerns about potential attacks on the U.S. and Japan. Discussions highlight the uncertainty regarding the yield and effectiveness of North Korea's nuclear arsenal, with comparisons made to historical bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Experts suggest that while a nuclear attack could cause significant destruction, the actual threat level may be lower than perceived, especially given North Korea's limited delivery capabilities. The potential impact of a nuclear strike would be devastating, with casualties and economic damage projected to be in the hundreds of billions. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for preparedness and understanding of nuclear threats rather than political blame.
  • #31
Ok, we're starting to move more toward politics...
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
Hey all...

One very quick and general comment...

I have some connection to the missle defense agency and have done work related to missle defense...

North Korea is seen as a possible immediate threat to Japan (although Japan would say this is an understatement...which is why they want THAAD) and a possible future threat to the US.

As far as I know that is the "official" position in the "industry".

But I am just an electrical engineer, not a politician or intelligence agent. :-p




Russ
 
  • #33
I think north korea is going to bomb us .. they are evil. I'm afraid..they already have the supplies to do it, and they probably don't like Bush with all the trouble he's getting into with all the wars. Damn it why didn't Bush send troops to north korea, let alone Iraq.
 
  • #34
Ok, we're starting to move more toward politics...

Yup, I was just going to write that...

I think north korea is going to bomb us .. they are evil. I'm afraid..they already have the supplies to do it, and they probably don't like Bush with all the trouble he's getting into with all the wars. Damn it why didn't Bush send troops to north korea, let alone Iraq.

I do not believe that was their intention. If it was, then they would've done so. Unless it was a bluff.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 205 ·
7
Replies
205
Views
29K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K