How can a 1-dimensional being prove they live on a circle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ugalpha
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Universe
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on how a one-dimensional being could mathematically prove it exists on a circle. Participants debate the nature of dimensions, topology, and how a one-dimensional universe could loop back on itself. Some argue that a one-dimensional being would not perceive any shape, while others suggest that a line can indeed have a non-trivial topology, such as a circle. The conversation highlights the distinction between visual and mathematical dimensions, emphasizing that a one-dimensional object can exist without requiring a higher-dimensional space for its definition. Overall, the thread explores complex mathematical concepts while questioning the very nature of dimensionality.
  • #31
yenchin said:
Similarly in a two dimensional infinite cylindrical universe, the inhabitants measure each triangle to sum up to 180 degrees, intrinsically the universe has *flat* geometry.
I just want to ask - this is true only for cylindrical geometry, not for sphere, right?
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #32
phinds said:
Why are you imposing "straight" on the concept of one-dimensional? The OP correctly did not.

I'm sorry for taking this argument 2 days back, but I think I can see the problem OP is having concerning curved 1-dimensional lines. Being curved implies being oriented in a different direction, and thus, along a different axis. So to give a description of a point along a line in an ℝ^n space would require n different coordinates. But, correct me if I'm wrong, even though the line is described in an ℝ*^n space, the line itself has only one dimension, it's length.
 
  • #33
rustynail said:
I'm sorry for taking this argument 2 days back, but I think I can see the problem OP is having concerning curved 1-dimensional lines. Being curved implies being oriented in a different direction, and thus, along a different axis. So to give a description of a point along a line in an ℝ^n space would require n different coordinates. But, correct me if I'm wrong, even though the line is described in an ℝ*^n space, the line itself has only one dimension, it's length.

Correct! Very astute observation!
 
  • #34
rustynail said:
I'm sorry for taking this argument 2 days back, but I think I can see the problem OP is having concerning curved 1-dimensional lines. Being curved implies being oriented in a different direction, and thus, along a different axis. So to give a description of a point along a line in an ℝ^n space would require n different coordinates. But, correct me if I'm wrong, even though the line is described in an ℝ*^n space, the line itself has only one dimension, it's length.
I thought that's what I said in post 24:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=3731892&postcount=24
and post 26:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=3733530&postcount=26
 
  • #36
minio said:
I just want to ask - this is true only for cylindrical geometry, not for sphere, right?

Yes. In a sphere you will know your space is curved *intrinsically*, so again you don't have to talk about any space outside of the sphere, that's the point of intrinsic geometry.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K