How Can a Juggler Determine the Time Interval Between Successive Throws?

Click For Summary
To determine the time interval between successive throws for a juggler throwing five balls to a height of 3.0 m, the key variables include gravitational acceleration (g = 9.8 m/s²) and the height (y = 3.0 m). The juggler's initial velocity and angle of elevation are initially unknown, complicating the calculations. By assuming the angle is approximately 90 degrees, the velocity can be derived from the height using energy principles. A suggested approach involves using the equation v² = v₀² + 2a(r - r₀) to find the necessary velocity for the throws. Ultimately, understanding the relationship between kinetic and potential energy is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
Alienjoey
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A juggler manages to keep five balls in motion, throwing each sequentially up a distance of 3.0 m. Determine the time interval between successive throws (Disregarding the time taken to transfer balls between hands).

Known variables:
g = 9.8 m/s^{2}
y = 3.0 m
x_0 = 0
y_0 = 0
t = ? (looking for)
\theta = ?
v = ?My main problem is not knowing an angle of elevation (though it must be near 90°) or a velocity. I'm sure there is something simple that I am missing, but I cannot seem to find it.

Homework Equations



v_x =v_0cos\theta -- initial velocity and angle unknown
v_y =v_0sin\theta - gt -- initial velocity and angle unknown
Trajectory: y = xtan\theta - gx^{2}/(2v_0^{2}cos^{2}\theta) -- need initial velocity and angle theta.

There are others that come to mind, but all seem to have similar problems.

The Attempt at a Solution



My initial thought was to find an x value for the maximum, and then use that number to find the time, but then I realized that I did not have the velocity or the angle. I thought of using some of the basic constant acceleration equations, but I constantly ran into problems due to the lack of t and v_0. I think one of my main problems is that I have not been able to incorporate the five balls into my answer as of yet. If somebody could point me in the right direction, it would be great. For those wondering, this is question 27a. in the fourth edition of chapter four of Resnick, Halliday, and Krane's Physics. (And this isn't for school, I'm attempting to teach it to myself. Most of the other problems weren't too bad, but this one is becoming a bit of a nuisance.) Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's okay to assume the angle is 90. The velocity can be determined from how high it goes. Think about kinetic and potential energy.
 
I tried to assume that for a little while, but then that tangent threw me for a loop there. :P

A friend pointed me to use v * v = v_0 * v_0 + 2a * (r - r_0), which I hadn't even thought of, and now I think I've figured it out. Thanks for the help, though!
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K