How can an infinity series be less than infinity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cauchy1789
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinity Series
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of infinite series and their convergence, specifically focusing on a space M consisting of sequences of real numbers where the sum of the squares of the terms is finite. The original poster seeks clarification on how such a series can be less than infinity.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the distinction between a sequence having infinitely many terms and the sum of those terms being finite. They provide examples of sequences that converge while their sums diverge, and question the implications of defining a vector space based on the finiteness of the sum of squares.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with several participants offering insights into the nature of convergent series and the definitions involved in vector spaces. Some participants express confusion about the relationship between the properties of the sequences and the inner product, while others suggest verifying the axioms of inner products in the context of the defined space M.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the definitions and properties of inner products and vector spaces, as well as the implications of the finiteness condition on the sequences involved. The discussion reflects a mix of foundational concepts and advanced topics, suggesting varying levels of familiarity among participants.

Cauchy1789
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have a space M which is a sequeces of real numbers [tex]\{x_n\}[/tex] where

[tex]\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} x_{n}^2 < \infty[/tex]

How can a series mentioned above be become than less than infinity??

Please explain :confused:

Sincerely
Cauchy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just because the series has infinitely many terms doesn't mean the sum of all those terms is infinite. For instance, if x_n = 1/2^(n/2), then we have:

[tex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} x_n^2 = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \left( \frac{1}{2^{n/2}} \right)^2 = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{2^n} = \frac{\frac{1}{2}}{1 - \frac{1}{2}} = 1[/tex]

You might want to do some reading on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convergent_series"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Citan Uzuki said:
Just because the series has infinitely many terms doesn't mean the sum of all those terms is infinite. For instance, if x_n = 1/2^(n/2), then we have:

[tex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} x_n^2 = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \left( \frac{1}{2^{n/2}} \right)^2 = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{2^n} = \frac{\frac{1}{2}}{1 - \frac{1}{2}} = 1[/tex]

You might want to do some reading on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convergent_series"

Then my above series can be written as

[tex]\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} x_{n}^2 = \lim_{n \to \infty} \int_{1}^{n} x_{n} ^2 dx < \infty[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cauchy1789 said:
Then my above series can be written as

[tex]\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} x_{n}^2 = \lim_{n \to \infty} \int_{1}^{n} x_{n} ^2 dx < \infty[/tex]
No.
That is completely nonsensical.

What were you trying to say?
 
arildno said:
No.
That is completely nonsensical.

What were you trying to say?

What I would simply like to understand is why a sequence of real numbers defined as in my original post can be less than infinity?

If M is a vectorspace is the "less than infinity" part because a Vectorspace is closed set?
 
What I would simply like to understand is why a sequence of real numbers defined as in my original post can be less than infinity?

It doesn't say that the sequence is less than infinity (and indeed, such a statement is nonsensical). It says that the sum of the squares of all the terms in the sequence is less than infinity. And I've already shown that there are sequences satisfying that requirement.

If M is a vectorspace is the "less than infinity" part because a Vectorspace is closed set?

No, the restriction on the sums of the squares is simply part of the definition of the vector space. It has nothing to do with whether the space is closed.
 
I get it now but anyway.

With the above then if I need to show that M has an inner product defined by

[tex]\langle{\{x_n\}, \{y_n\}}\rangle = \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} x_n y_n[/tex]

So what I need to do here isn't to show since the Vector Space M is defined as

[tex]\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} x_n^2 < \infty[/tex] which is the sum of the squared real vector components of the space.

and then if the definition of the inner product applied gives

[tex]\langle{x_n, x_n}\rangle = \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} x_n^2[/tex]

then the inner product of two vector sequences of real numbers (if y is defined on M) is [tex]{\{x_n\}, \{y_n\}} = \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} x_n y_n[/tex] ?
 
You are given a definition, namely that:

[tex]\langle \vec{x},\ \vec{y} \rangle = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} x_ny_n[/tex]

where [itex]\vec{x} = \{x_n\}[/itex], and likewise [itex]\vec{y} = \{y_n\}[/itex]. What you need to do is show that this function is an inner product on M. Look up the definition of an inner product, and verify that this function satisfies that definition.
 
It's not clear to me what you are asked to show. Is it this:
Show that
[tex]\langle{\{x_n\}, \{y_n\}}\rangle = \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} x_n y_n[/tex]
is an inner product for M?

If that's the question, you need to verify that the axioms for an inner product hold; namely
symmetry-- [itex]\langle{\{x_n\}, \{y_n\}}\rangle = \langle{\{y_n\}, \{x_n\}}\rangle[/itex]
linearity in the first variable--[itex]\langle{\{a*x_n\}, \{y_n\}}\rangle = a\langle{\{x_n\}, \{y_n\}}\rangle[/itex],
and [itex]\langle{\{x_n\}, \{y_n\} + \{z_n\}}\rangle = \langle{\{x_n\}, \{y_n\}}\rangle + \langle{\{x_n\}, \{z_n\}}\rangle[/itex]
positive definiteness--[itex]\langle{\{x_n\}, \{x_n\}}\rangle > 0[/itex]

For more information, see the wikipedia article titled "inner product space".
 
  • #10
Cauchy1789 said:

Homework Statement



I have a space M which is a sequeces of real numbers [tex]\{x_n\}[/tex] where

[tex]\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} x_{n}^2 < \infty[/tex]

How can a series mentioned above be become than less than infinity??

Please explain :confused:

Sincerely
Cauchy
There are a couple of things going on here that you might not be clear on. The space M consists of sequences for which the sum of their squares is finite.

A sequence and its sum are two separate things. A sequence can converge even while the sum of its terms does not.

For example, the sequence {x_n} = {1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, ..., 1/n, ...} converges to zero, but the infinite sum of all of its terms diverges (to infinity).
 
  • #11
Mark44 said:
It's not clear to me what you are asked to show. Is it this:
Show that
[tex]\langle{\{x_n\}, \{y_n\}}\rangle = \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} x_n y_n[/tex]
is an inner product for M?

If that's the question, you need to verify that the axioms for an inner product hold; namely
symmetry-- [itex]\langle{\{x_n\}, \{y_n\}}\rangle = \langle{\{y_n\}, \{x_n\}}\rangle[/itex]
linearity in the first variable--[itex]\langle{\{a*x_n\}, \{y_n\}}\rangle = a\langle{\{x_n\}, \{y_n\}}\rangle[/itex],
and [itex]\langle{\{x_n\}, \{y_n\} + \{z_n\}}\rangle = \langle{\{x_n\}, \{y_n\}}\rangle + \langle{\{x_n\}, \{z_n\}}\rangle[/itex]
positive definiteness--[itex]\langle{\{x_n\}, \{x_n\}}\rangle > 0[/itex]

For more information, see the wikipedia article titled "inner product space".

Yes with respect to the definition that M is Vector Space consisting of real numbers with

[tex]\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} x_n^2 < \infty[/tex]. This last part that means that the squared normed space on M is less than infinity? Thus the normed space is not infinitely large and then its possible to test the properties of the inner product on it?
 
  • #12
This last part that means that the squared normed space on M is less than infinity? Thus the normed space is not infinitely large and then its possible to test the properties of the inner product on it?
No. This doesn't make any sense. We're not talking about the numeric value of a normed space, or how large geometrically it is, just whether your particular space M has an inner product. You have the definition of <{xn}, {yn}>. Now your job is to show that this inner product satisfies the three axioms I listed. If it does, then your space of infinite sequences is an inner product space.
 
  • #13
Question.

Does all axioms of the product have to shown in context with the desired space M in order to show that the inner product and x and y satisfies the definition?
 
Last edited:
  • #14
What course is this for? I would think that theorem "if {[itex]x_n[/itex]} and {[itex]y_n[/itex]} are "square summable" ([itex]\Sigma x_n^2[/itex] and [itex]\Sigma y_n^2[/itex] converge) then [itex]\Sigma x_ny_n[/itex] converges" would be in a fairly advanced course, perhaps "Functional Analysis" but you asking very elementary questions from calculus or precalculus.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K