How can ellipticity angle be negative.

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter yungman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Negative
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of ellipticity angle in plane wave elliptical polarization, specifically addressing how a negative ellipticity angle indicates Right Hand Circular polarization (RHC) as opposed to Left Hand Circular polarization (LHC) for a positive angle. Participants clarify that the sign of the arcus tangens is not inherently fixed and can be either positive or negative, depending on the wave's polarization. The inquiry also includes a request for visual representation of a negative ellipticity angle, highlighting the need for a clearer understanding of this concept.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of plane wave elliptical polarization
  • Familiarity with the concept of ellipticity angle
  • Knowledge of circular polarization types (LHC and RHC)
  • Basic grasp of trigonometric functions, specifically arcus tangens
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical representation of ellipticity angle in wave polarization
  • Study visual representations of circular polarization, focusing on negative ellipticity angles
  • Explore the implications of ellipticity angle on wave behavior in "Engineering Electromagnetics" by Ulaby
  • Investigate the relationship between ellipticity angle and other polarization parameters
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, electrical engineering, and optics who are studying wave polarization and its implications in various applications.

yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
291
In plane wave elliptical polarization, the book said if the Ellipticity angle is possitive, it is a Left Hand Circular polarization(LHC). If Ellipticity angle is negative, it is Right Hand Circular polarization(RHC).

My question is how can Ellipticity angle be negative?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarization_%28waves%29

Can anyone show a picture of negative Ellipticity angle?

In case this sounds ridiculous, attached is the scan of the paragraph from the "Engineering Electromagnetics" by Ulaby. I have to scan in two part to fit the size limit. First is Ulaby1 and then Ulaby2.

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • Ulaby1L.png
    Ulaby1L.png
    46.7 KB · Views: 649
  • Ulaby2L.png
    Ulaby2L.png
    47 KB · Views: 763
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
I don't see what is the problem with a negative ellipticity angle.
The sign of the arcus tangens is not fixed by it's argument, it can be either positive or negative. To decide which one to choose, you have to look at the polarisation of the wave.
 
DrDu said:
I don't see what is the problem with a negative ellipticity angle.
The sign of the arcus tangens is not fixed by it's argument, it can be either positive or negative. To decide which one to choose, you have to look at the polarisation of the wave.

The question is how to draw a negative ellipticity angle physically?
\chi\;=\;\tan^{-1} \frac {a_{\eta}}{a_{\epsilon}}
Both are just length and is never negative.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K