How can energy be converted into matter?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter 5echild
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Matter
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of converting energy into matter, exploring theoretical frameworks and the implications of such a conversion. Participants engage with the topic from various angles, including assumptions about energy-matter relationships and the mathematical formulations involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that energy can condense into matter, questioning the formula or method for such a conversion.
  • One participant emphasizes the distinction between watts (power) and joules (energy), noting the lack of proof regarding the reversibility of matter to energy.
  • Another participant asserts that the conversion of energy into matter is an experimentally confirmed fact, referencing particle colliders like the LHC as evidence.
  • A participant critiques the use of the term "condenses," suggesting it implies a specific physical process that may not be applicable in this context, advocating for a clearer formulation of the question.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the assumptions regarding energy-matter conversion, with some asserting it as a fact while others question the implications and terminology used. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the terminology used, indicating that certain words carry specific implications in physics that may complicate the discussion. There is also mention of the need for precise mathematical formulations in understanding the concepts involved.

5echild
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I don't know either, but I understand that there are people working on this.
For the sake of this discussion let us assume that energy does in fact condense into matter, and further let us assume that we have x amount of energy in watts. My question is how would one convert said amount of energy into matter? What is the formula? Any ideas? This would be most helpful with some work I'm doing.
Thank you much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
5echild said:
I don't know either, but I understand that there are people working on this.
For the sake of this discussion let us assume that energy does in fact condense into matter, and further let us assume that we have x amount of energy in watts. My question is how would one convert said amount of energy into matter? What is the formula? Any ideas? This would be most helpful with some work I'm doing.
Thank you much.
Watts is a unit of power while Joule is to energy. Anyhow, there's not much proof if matter in the form of energy will consequently reversed back to its original state without compromise. Prof. Shankar from Yale study this type of physics.

Anyhow, Einstein famous equation usually defines the absolute content of energy in a given x matter as you said. E=mc2, others oppose to this formula since, a fixed reference in the universe is not yet found or established. So, they are assuming that all mass in space has some momentum in it, therefore, the equation turns out to be like this
46d9fd53de36a1fc22d818633b0b18b9.png

and by the Second Law of Thermodynamics, that equation is not reversible.
 
5echild said:
For the sake of this discussion let us assume that energy does in fact condense into matter,
We don't need to assume it. It is an experimentally confirmed fact. This is the operating principle behind particle collider's like the LHC.

Ronie posted the correct formula.
 
5echild said:
I don't know either, but I understand that there are people working on this.
For the sake of this discussion let us assume that energy does in fact condense into matter, and further let us assume that we have x amount of energy in watts. My question is how would one convert said amount of energy into matter? What is the formula? Any ideas? This would be most helpful with some work I'm doing.
Thank you much.

The thing about physics that you should be aware of is that practically EVERY concepts and ideas have underlying mathematical formulation or description, and because of this, these ideas and concepts are governed by a large set of rules.

I'm pointing this out to you, and to many who are not familiar with physics, so that you understand why there is a problem with your question. The word "condenses" has more definite meaning than what you are using here, and you may not be aware of it. For example, we say that steam condenses into water. This has very specific meaning and implication in physics, i.e. we simply can't throw out words like that without consequences. It implies that there is some sort of a phase transition, where certain parameters become "discontinuous". In other words, if one uses such a word, one must understand that THIS is what one is implying. That word, and my others, carry with them, certain "baggage".

If you wish to ask how "energy" can change into "matter", then ask that, rather than embellishing it as "condenses" into it. The latter simply adds more constraint to the question that turns it from a simple question, to something more complex.

Zz.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
15K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 264 ·
9
Replies
264
Views
24K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K