B How Can I Calculate Negative Multiplication Without Following Traditional Rules?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating negative multiplication without adhering to traditional rules. A user presents a scenario of multiplying 6 pencils by negative two, concluding that 6 x -2 equals -6 based on their reasoning. However, others clarify that starting with 6 pencils means the equation should be interpreted as 6 + (-2 x 6), resulting in -6. If the initial count were zero, the outcome would be -12, emphasizing the importance of the starting value in calculations. The thread concludes with a reminder that the original post was deleted after receiving clarification, which is against forum rules.
pyroclasticsoul
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Do NOT delete your Original Post after you have received replies and help
TL;DR Summary
Negative times positive
Say I have 6 pencils. I want to times this by negative two. Now ignoring the rules that your teacher taught you work this out. 6 pencils negative 2 times. Negative one time would be 0 and another negative times would be -6 right? So 6 x - 2 = -6 according to simple logic. The calculator will say -12 but if I took 6 away from 6 3 times that would be -12.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes PeroK
Mathematics news on Phys.org
pyroclasticsoul said:
TL;DR Summary: Negative times positive

Say I have 6 pencils. I want to times this by negative two. Now ignoring the rules that your teacher taught you work this out. 6 pencils negative 2 times. Negative one time would be 0 and another negative times would be -6 right? So 6 x - 2 = -6 according to simple logic. The calculator will say -12 but if I took 6 away from 6 3 times that would be -12.
No. You started out with 6. "I have 6 pencils." You're describing 6 + -2x6 which equals -6.

If you had started out with zero, then the final answer would indeed be -12.
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
DaveC426913 said:
No. You started out with 6. "I have 6 pencils." You're describing 6 + -2x6 which equals -6.

If you had started out with zero, then the final answer would indeed be -12.
I thought about that but why do I start with 0 and not 6 since 6 is the number adjusted by -2.
 
pyroclasticsoul said:
why do I start with 0

Read the problem statement you wrote.

"I have 6 pencils"

The problem starts at +6 pencils.
 
Note -- the OP deleted their first post after getting help from Dave. This is not allowed. The OP text is restored and this thread is now closed.
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS, Bystander and topsquark
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'

Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'

Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
View full post »
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'

Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'

Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
View full post »

Thread 'Fermat's Last Theorem'

Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Death Rally: an intricate probability problem?
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Is the equation 0!=1 based on flawed reasoning?
2
Replies
55
Views
5K
How to correctly round in physics?
Replies
8
Views
2K
MHB How Can You Calculate the Area of Shaded Regions in Complex Geometric Figures?
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Time evolution of the electromagnetic wavefunction on a lattice
Replies
9
Views
2K
I Karatsuba multiplication implementation question
Replies
3
Views
2K
Commutative property of multiplication
Replies
8
Views
4K
MHB How can I find these coefficients?
Replies
6
Views
2K
Torque on a Pivot Point With Multiple Forces and Different Directions
Replies
6
Views
2K
I How Do You Calculate Day-Specific Phase Shifts in Excel for Sine Waves?
Replies
7
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top