How can I calculate this integral using contour integration?

Click For Summary
To calculate the integral ∫_0^{∞} (x^a/(1+x)^2) dx for -1<a<1 using contour integration, a key-hole contour is recommended, focusing on the residue at the second-order pole z=-1. The residue involves the multi-valued function z^a, which requires careful selection of the branch to compute correctly. The residue at z=-1 is given by ae^{(a-1)\pi i}, leading to the integral's evaluation along the contour's paths. Ultimately, the integral simplifies to (1-e^{2\pi i a}) times the original integral, equating to 2πi times the calculated residue. This approach clarifies the integral's evaluation and confirms the expected result of πa/sin(πa).
ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
606
I want to calculate the integral \int_0^{\infty} \frac{x^a}{(1+x)^2}dx \ (-1&lt;a&lt;1) via contour integration But it seems a little tricky.
I tried to solve it like example4 in the page ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contour_integral#Example_.28IV.29_.E2.80.93_branch_cuts ) but I arrived at zero which I know is wrong.(The answer is \frac{\pi a}{\sin{\pi a}})What's the point?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shyan said:
I want to calculate the integral \int_0^{\infty} \frac{x^a}{(1+x)^2}dx \ (-1&lt;a&lt;1) via contour integration But it seems a little tricky.
I tried to solve it like example4 in the page ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contour_integral#Example_.28IV.29_.E2.80.93_branch_cuts ) but I arrived at zero which I know is wrong.(The answer is \frac{\pi a}{\sin{\pi a}})What's the point?
Thanks

The integral isn't too hard via a key-hole contour with the slot along the positive real axis except you have to be careful to compute the residue of the multi-valued function, z^a. Let's look at that. We have:

\frac{z^a}{(1+z)^2}

and so that's a second-order pole at z=-1 so the residue is just the derivative of z^a at z=-1. But that's a multi-valued function for -1&lt;a&lt;1 so that expression has a potentially infinite number of answers. Well, the particular residue depends over which sheet of the function we integrate over. Suppose it was just z^{1/2}. Then we could integrate over the branch

z^{1/2}=e^{1/2(\ln(r)+i\theta)},\quad 0&lt;\theta\leq 2\pi

Ok, then that's the expression we would use to compute the residue:

\text{Res}\left(\frac{z^{1/2}}{(1+z)^2},-1\right)=1/2 e^{-1/2(\ln(-1)+\pi i)}=1/2 e^{-\pi i}=-1/2

Same dif for any a in that range if we use that particular determination of z^a:

\text{Res}\left(\frac{z^{a}}{(1+z)^2},-1\right)=ae^{(a-1)(\ln|z|+i\theta)},\quad 0&lt;\theta\leq 2 \pi

and therefore the residue for that particular sheet of the multivalued function z^a at z=-1 is ae^{(a-1)\pi i} right?

Now it's easy to compute the integral over the various legs of that contour: On the top leg along the real axis it's just the real integral. But on the lower leg, z^a=e^{a(\ln(r)+2\pi i)} and I'll leave it to you to verify the integrals over the circular large and small arcs of the contour go to zero. And we're left with:

\left(1-e^{2\pi i a}\right) \int_0^{\infty}\frac{x^a}{(1+x)^2}dx=2\pi i r
where r is that residue above.
 
Last edited:
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
904
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K