How can I handle an infinite upper limit in an integral for a photovoltaic cell?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around handling an integral with an infinite upper limit in the context of a photovoltaic cell problem. The original poster expresses difficulty in completing the calculation due to the integral's upper limit being infinity and mentions that the problem cannot be solved analytically.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the infinite upper limit and question the validity of the methods used for integration. There are attempts to clarify the correct lower limit for the integral and the appropriate approach to evaluate it.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on evaluating the integral and suggested tools for numerical integration. There is ongoing exploration of the correct values to use in calculations, with multiple interpretations of the problem being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note constraints such as the inability to use computational tools during exams and the need to accurately determine the lower limit for the integral, which is a point of contention in the discussion.

dscot
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi,

So I have this problem regarding a photovoltaic cell I found part 1 easy and part 2 wasn't actually too bad either but I couldn't finish the calculation. I managed to get to the stage where I have an integral , the problem is that the upper limit is infinity and I'm not really sure how to handle that, the question also mentions that the problem cannot be solved analytically?

The full question - http://screencast.com/t/C96Kqs3M
solution: http://screencast.com/t/szPlkSEAYE6A

Homework Equations



Provided in solution link ( see above)

The Attempt at a Solution



So I found a table of standard integrals that matched the stage I got up to and I used the value there and carried on solving as normal but I ended up with the wrong final answer. The value I found for the integral was 2.4 but I think this is the wrong method as it only valid for 0 to infinity?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
dscot said:

Homework Statement



Hi,

So I have this problem regarding a photovoltaic cell I found part 1 easy and part 2 wasn't actually too bad either but I couldn't finish the calculation. I managed to get to the stage where I have an integral , the problem is that the upper limit is infinity and I'm not really sure how to handle that, the question also mentions that the problem cannot be solved analytically?

The full question - http://screencast.com/t/C96Kqs3M
solution: http://screencast.com/t/szPlkSEAYE6A

Homework Equations



Provided in solution link ( see above)

The Attempt at a Solution



So I found a table of standard integrals that matched the stage I got up to and I used the value there and carried on solving as normal but I ended up with the wrong final answer. The value I found for the integral was 2.4 but I think this is the wrong method as it only valid for 0 to infinity?

Yes, 2.4 is for lower limit 0 and your lower limit is substantially different from 0. What is the correct lower limit? Do you have a tool like Mathematica you can use to evaluate the correct number? And integrating to get a number flux won't really help you get the total power. You want to integrate energy*dJ, don't you?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi Dick,

Sorry some of the solution got cut off, the full version is here: http://screencast.com/t/Ss2toUdI

I calculate the actual value of the lower limit to be, 1.6911*10^-19 if I have performed the calculation correctly.

Sadly, I think we may need to do something like this in an exam so I won't be able to use any of the tools you mentioned.

Thanks again
Dave
 
Last edited by a moderator:
dscot said:
Hi Dick,

Sorry some of the solution got cut off, the full version is here: http://screencast.com/t/Ss2toUdI

I calculate the actual value of the lower limit to be, 1.6911*10^-19 if I have performed the calculation correctly.

Sadly, I think we may need to do something like this in an exam so I won't be able to use any of the tools you mentioned.

Thanks again
Dave

If the lower limit were as small as 10^(-19) you could safely ignore the difference between that and 0. But I get the lower limit to come out about 2.5. You can't really ignore that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi Dick,

I'm still unsure about this so I may have to speak to my teacher again.

In the meantime any ideas on how to do the next part? When inputting the values into the Q equation from my last post I get 1.10794× 10^-26 W which is wrong? We have the value for N,h and f so it should simply be a case of plugging them into the equation?
 
dscot said:
Hi Dick,

I'm still unsure about this so I may have to speak to my teacher again.

In the meantime any ideas on how to do the next part? When inputting the values into the Q equation from my last post I get 1.10794× 10^-26 W which is wrong? We have the value for N,h and f so it should simply be a case of plugging them into the equation?

You've got the right N even though the solution left off a 1/c^2 factor. Then sure, you should just multiply that by hf_G. I get the stated answer. What numbers did you use? For a shortcut hf_G is just 1.1 eV, right?
 
Hi Dick,

So I'm using N (8.62*10^25) from the answer at the moment, h = 6.63^10-34 and I converted 1.1 ev into joules so 1.76 × 10-19. But those values gave me an incorrect value for Q. The answers show it should be 15.2MWm-2 but my answer was much smaller?

If I understand you correctly the correct method is to multiply 8.62*10^25(N) by 1.1? This also gives me the wrong answer so I think I might have misunderstood you?
 
dscot said:
Hi Dick,

So I'm using N (8.62*10^25) from the answer at the moment, h = 6.63^10-34 and I converted 1.1 ev into joules so 1.76 × 10-19. But those values gave me an incorrect value for Q. The answers show it should be 15.2MWm-2 but my answer was much smaller?

If I understand you correctly the correct method is to multiply 8.62*10^25(N) by 1.1? This also gives me the wrong answer so I think I might have misunderstood you?

hf_G is the band gap energy of 1.1 eV. If you want to actually find f_G then it's (1.1 eV)/h=2.66*10^14/s. The way I think you are doing it you are multiplying by h twice instead of cancelling it out. Yes, N*(1.1 eV) is correct. Convert to that joules.
 
Last edited:
Wow thank you so much! I finally get it now :)

I really appreciate you being so patient with me , I know I'm really slow at learning things :D

Hopefully I'll be in a position to help others someday just like you have helped me!

Thanks again!
 
  • #10
dscot said:
Wow thank you so much! I finally get it now :)

I really appreciate you being so patient with me , I know I'm really slow at learning things :D

Hopefully I'll be in a position to help others someday just like you have helped me!

Thanks again!

No problem. If you want to go back the integral issue then try and compute the lower bound again. It's just plugging in numbers. You'll probably get it right now. Then you can ask Wolfram Alpha to evaluate it for you. It's the easiest way I can think of to do numerical integration.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K