How can I ignite these three rocket igniters?

[Max CR]

There just has to be a cheaper alternative to all of this. How about adding three 9 volt batteries in parallel in the circuit? That is where my line of thinking is right now. I don't want to spend anything over $20. As I said before, I was able to successfully do this once before using two batteries in parallel charged at 10 volts with the igniters in parellell also. The only problem with doing this again is that the batteries will not stay at 10 volts because they are not desigend to do so.

How can I work out this situation from here? I have tried putting the batteries in series but that did not work. It seems the batteries have to be in parallel so their amperage will add up but yet the voltage also needs to be 10 volts or above

 

[minorwork]

I'm going to have to pick up one of those disposable cameras and see what it will do. Lots of stuff on YouTube on this. This http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XXfEoDIF0Q". Three cameras for $9 from wal mart. Good price. Three hundred volts available from a single AA cell.

Note how taking apart the cameras can get you shocked if you don't discharge the capacitor.

 

[minorwork]

There just has to be a cheaper alternative to all of this. How about adding three 9 volt batteries in parallel in the circuit? That is where my line of thinking is right now. I don't want to spend anything over $20. As I said before, I was able to successfully do this once before using two batteries in parallel charged at 10 volts with the igniters in parellell also. The only problem with doing this again is that the batteries will not stay at 10 volts because they are not desigend to do so.

How can I work out this situation from here? I have tried putting the batteries in series but that did not work. It seems the batteries have to be in parallel so their amperage will add up but yet the voltage also needs to be 10 volts or above

Cheaper, better, faster. Pick two.

 

[Max CR]

Cheaper, better, faster. Pick two.

What does this mean? ...

 

[negitron]

It means you can do something better and cheaper, faster and cheaper or better and faster. But not all three.

It's an old engineering maxim.

 

[minorwork]

What does this mean? ...

This is the engineer's mantra. When management wants something done the engineer presents the three choices to management. Cheaper, faster, better. You can only get two. If the solution is cheap and fast it won't be better. If better and cheaper it will take longer to produce. If faster and better then it will certainly not be cheap.

These be the trade offs that concern any designed product. Where did the mantra come from? I don't know. I think the trade offs are some kind of state law.:

This applies in all areas. Your igniter problem in particular. If a capacitor were in existence that could be the same size as the battery and store the same amount of energy and could drain itself totally in in a second then it would be expensive. If you want the solution now it might be cheap and available from parts you already have but it will not be the best solution.

Clearer now? It is a humorous fact of life. Applies to wives too. Just don't tell mine.

 

[Max CR]

So I just did two tests. All three igniters were in parallel.

For my first test, the two batteries had a voltage of 9.65 volts. They were in series. There was ccontinuity.Only two of the three igniters ignited.

For my second test, the two batteries had a voltage of 9.65 volts. They were in parallel. There was continuity. Again, only two of the three igniters ignited. The same igniter did not ignite.

I am considering adding a third battery to the batteries in series. Thsi would bring the voltage up to about 27 volts. Do you think this would be good enough to ignite the three igniters simultaneously? What I don't udnerstand, is that each igniter seems to require 9.6 volts to igntie. However, they are getting more volts than that and there is still failure. Good it be the amperage that is the problem? Should I put the three batteries in parllel?

What other cost effective solutions could there be?

 

[Phrak]

What is the resistance of your igniters?

 

[Max CR]

0.8 ohms each

 

[Max CR]

Now let's say that I put all of the igntiers in series. There is continuity throughout the series. Does that mean that all three igniters must ignite? Will the voltage and amperage be easily disributed? Is it possible for only one igniter to ignite and two not? I have spent nearly the whole day working on this with no success. This is extremely frustrating.

 

[Max CR]

I am using this switch in the circuit. Do you think that this could be the problem? It says that it is rated five amps. Does that mean that it can support up to five amps?

http://radioshack.com/product/index.jsp?productId=2049718&parentPage=family

 

[Max CR]

Any ideas?

 

[Max CR]

Ok. I am giong to try and put these igniters in series tomorrow. How does that sound? I mean, the regular controler to ignite an igniter uses four 1.5 volt batteries in series. That means that the igniter requires 6 volts to ignite. Say if I put the three igniters I have in series and I have two 9 volt batteries also in series, then this should cause the igniters to ignite, correct? Shouldn't just one 9 volt battery get the job done?

I can't get over how unsuccessful this is. I am trying to figure out WHAT will work?? Will thsi work?!

 

[Phrak]

0.8 ohms each

OK. Three in parallel will have a resistance of 0.27 ohms. And you never came back to say how your camera experiments went after everyone was so helpful, so why am helping now?

For greatest power transfer from batteries to igniters you want the batteries to have the same value of internal resistance. Get on your search engine and look up the impedence of 9 volt batteries.

Why are you using 9V batteries rather than 1.5V?

Commercial 9 volt alkaline batteries have a resistance of 2.8 ohms. For two in parallel 80% of the power goes to heating the batteries.

Panasonic quotes 0.13 ohms for their AA alkalines. Dollars to nickles.

What other sources of resistance do you have? What gauge and how long are the wires? is there a relay involved?

 

[Vanadium 50]

Any ideas?

You're scaring me. That was 4 minutes since your last message. If you're that impatient, I worry about you handling rocket engines. I also worry because minorwork gave you what looks to be a very valuable link, which you seem not to have taken the time to read.

Rockets can be dangerous. Placing the ignition source on the rocket and out of your direct control adds to the danger. Using an ignition source that was not designed by an expert adds to the danger. Focusing on cost and not safety adds to the danger.

 

[minorwork]

I am using this switch in the circuit. Do you think that this could be the problem? It says that it is rated five amps. Does that mean that it can support up to five amps?

http://radioshack.com/product/index.jsp?productId=2049718&parentPage=family

Close the points of the micro switch and test for resistance across the switch. On resistance first then with the digital meter setting on the diode symbol. On this setting (the diode setting) the digits indicate voltage dropped across the points. The meter on this setting flows a bunch more current than the resistance setting and reveals bad connections more reliably than the resistance setting.

I think your main problem is the parallel wiring arrangement. If anyone or two has less resistance for any amount of time for whatever reason then the current will go to the path(s) of least resistance and not leave enough energy for your dud igniter. Any of the six connections to the igniters can screw you up because of this.

I don't know why you think that in a properly powered series setup that the first will go off before the rest. Test those cheap *** camera strobe power supplies. They looked hot enough with all those sparks they showed on YouTube that I know I don't want to get across the leads.

I once got into an SCR scoop car capacitor without discharging it. I thought it'd blown off a fingernail. It would leave a pit in a screwdriver. I've never been hit by a flyback transformer but one of the older electricians said it was the worst shock he'd ever got. My worst was 300 VDC trolley wire to the frame of a mantrip from one hand across to the other. My muscles contracted so hard that I was throwed away and luckily broke the circuit.

 

[negitron]

Rockets can be dangerous. Placing the ignition source on the rocket and out of your direct control adds to the danger. Using an ignition source that was not designed by an expert adds to the danger. Focusing on cost and not safety adds to the danger.

Agreed. Max, in the interest of your safety and that of others, I'm afraid I'm going to have to refuse to further help you on this project and urge others to do likewise. I don't want to discourage you from model rocketry as it can be a fun and educational hobby, if performed safely. You are reckless. I strongly urge you to find a local model rocketry club in your area and learn more about it. Educate yourself on the principles involved. Get some personal assistance from one of the experienced members, who is more able to provide the type of guidance you require. Please, before you seriously hurt yourself or someone else.

I'm also recommending to the Mentors that they close this thread.