How can I prove this algebraic manipulation equation?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving an algebraic manipulation involving the equation a^2/(a^2 - b^2 - c^2) + b^2/(b^2 - a^2 - c^2) + c^2/(c^2 - a^2 - b^2) = 3/2, given that a + b + c = 0. Participants explore various approaches to validate this equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss cross multiplying and combining like terms as an initial approach. Some suggest considering the implications of a + b + c = 0, noting that at least one of the variables must be negative. Others propose substituting c with - (a + b) to simplify the expression further.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various lines of reasoning, with some participants offering alternative methods and insights. There is no explicit consensus on a single approach, but multiple interpretations and strategies are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need to prove the identity under the constraint that a + b + c = 0, and some express uncertainty about the algebraic manipulation involved. There is also a note about the nature of the equations being discussed, distinguishing between equations and identities.

Frillth
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I need to prove the following equation is true, given that a + b + c = 0:
a^2/(a^2 - b^2 - c^2) + b^2/(b^2 - a^2 - c^2) + c^2/(c^2 - a^2 - b^2) = 3/2

Homework Equations



a + b + c = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



I wasn't sure what to do at first, so I tried cross multiplying the equation and combining like terms. I came up with:

-a^6 - b^6 - c^6 + a^4b^2 + a^4c^2 + b^4a^2 + b^4c^2 + c^4a^2 + c^4b^2 + 6a^2b^2c^2 = 0

It looks like this should factor out nicely, but I can't seem to figure out how. Can anybody help me out?

Edit: Finally got it solved. This was way easier than I tried to make it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That makes me dizzy. Just inspecting it (i'll work on it later) it might be a bit easier to note that a + b + c that there exist at least 1 negative value in there (assuming a, b, c are real). From there you could possibly prove by cases that will equal to 3/2.
 
Yeah, that is a much nicer way of writing what I had. Sorry about the plain text, I just haven't used latex before.

Edit: Somebody else posted here earlier, but they must have deleted their post. It was just a reworking of my problem in latex.
 
Last edited:
Just set, say, c=-(a+b) and plug it in wherever c occurs. Then simplify.

By the way, a+b+c=0 is an equation, whereas the other is an identity.
 
Notice that if your quadratic identity is true for a,b and c then it's also true for ra, rb and rc for any nonzero constant r. So you could just choose, say a=1. So if you can prove it for a=1, c=-(1+b), then you've proved it for all a,b,c (at least the ones for which it is defined).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K