I How Can I Solve for d in This Equation and What Software Can Verify It?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mech_LS24
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approach
Mech_LS24
Messages
148
Reaction score
16
TL;DR Summary
I would like to solve the equation for "d".
Dear mathematicians,

I am getting stuck solving this equation for "d". And what (free)software would you recommend to check this equation?
IMG_20220827_130742__01.jpg


SolveFord.jpg


Thanks a lot!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Use desmos or something or wolfram alpha
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark and Mech_LS24
Mech_LS24 said:
Summary: I would like to solve the equation for "d".

Dear mathematicians,

I am getting stuck solving this equation for "d". And what (free)software would you recommend to check this equation?
View attachment 313333

View attachment 313334

Thanks a lot!
Unless something cancels it's going to be a 10th order polynomial. And given your numbers it's highly unlikely to be factorable. W|A, Mathematica, or Matlab would be my suggestions.

-Dan
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42 and Mech_LS24
If you really want to attack that expression, I recommend the substitutions ##x=0.033^2 -d^2 ## and ##y=0.033^2+d^2##. And you should consider using a Weierstraß substitution!
 
  • Like
Likes Mech_LS24, topsquark and malawi_glenn
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top