How Can I Solve This Compound Harmonic Motion Problem with Different Methods?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves analyzing a mechanical system exhibiting compound harmonic motion, with specific initial conditions provided for two variables, y1 and y2. Participants are exploring various methods to determine the motion of the system, including the application of Laplace transformations and differential equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of free body diagrams and the necessity of identifying forces acting on the masses. There are mentions of different methods such as Laplace transformations, reduction to differential equations, and substitution techniques. Questions arise about the relevance of gravity in the calculations and the interpretation of initial conditions.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided suggestions and methods for approaching the problem, while others express uncertainty about the application of these methods. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of ignoring gravity and how it affects the equations. The discussion reflects a mix of ideas and interpretations without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem involves ideal springs and point masses, and there is a specific focus on the initial conditions provided. The discussion also highlights the complexity of the problem and the potential for multiple valid approaches.

mrzvengeance
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Spring.jpg


Determine the motion of this mechanical system satisfying the initial conditions :-
y1(0) = 1
y2(0) = 2
y1'(0) = -2*sqrt(6)
y2'(0) = sqrt(6)

Hint : there are 4 different methods you can use to solve this problem. They all give the same exact result.

I need to know what y1(t) and y2(t) are, please

Homework Equations


I know the shm equations- are they valid here?

The Attempt at a Solution



total k = 1/(1/k1+1/k2)

total m = m1 + m2

Help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could start with a free body diagram for each mass and the corresponding equations.
 
Hmm do I need a diagram to solve?
 
Strictly speaking no, but it usually helps. What you need is all the forces on each mass.
 
Any ideas?
 
Some ideas have been given. But we are not seeing any effort on your part.
 
I got another help from a friend, here is what he told me...

The calculations in your way will be rather long so I use the Laplace transformations. Are you familiar with that?
The first and best is Laplace. The second, long one, is to add different sin AND cos curves. The first approach is to give the y1- and y2-equations right. Your approach is wrong. Then put the initial conditions right. One is wrong for you. Then determine w.
When you done that one can write the curves in a graph. I have done that in my solution to control my equations solution. As you suggest you can do it any way if you have the initial conditions right (I believe).
This is a really hard problem for one who is not familiar and the Laplace as a working tool.

I am not familiar with Laplace. Are you? Here is my idea...

Upper mass:
Upper mass, upward spring force -> -k1*y1 = -3*y1
upper mass, downward spring force -> k2*(y2-y1) = 2*(y2-y1)
the change in length of the upper spring is y1, and in the lower spring is y2 - y1
Eq1 --> y1" = -5*y1 + 2*y2
Eq2 --> y2" = 2*y1 - 2*y2

I think the solutions may be

1. Reduction to a fourth-order differential equation.
2. Triangularization using operators.3. Substitution of Y(t) = X*exp(wt).3. Substitution of Y(t) = X*exp(wt).
4. Diagonalization.
 
Last edited:
Any ideas?
 
I am sorry, somehow I missed your previous message. Your method is essentially correct, but you forget there is also gravity.
 
  • #10
I am told gravity pulls on the weights to start the springs moving, but you don't need to deal with gravity in the calculations.
 
  • #11
Do you mean that ##y_1## and ##y_2## are measured from the equilibrium condition?
 
  • #12
voko said:
Do you mean that ##y_1## and ##y_2## are measured from the equilibrium condition?

ideal springs, point masses cannot collide, y1 and y2 are the distances of the bottom end of the springs from the top, so that the length of the second spring is y2-y1. As for gravitational effects, gravity pulls on the weights to start the springs moving, but you don't need to deal with gravity in your calculations.
 
  • #13
This statement: "gravity pulls on the weights to start the springs moving, but you don't need to deal with gravity in your calculations" does not make a whole lot of sense. Still, if you are told to ignore gravity, then you all you need to do is solve your equations.
 
  • #14
voko said:
This statement: "gravity pulls on the weights to start the springs moving, but you don't need to deal with gravity in your calculations" does not make a whole lot of sense. Still, if you are told to ignore gravity, then you all you need to do is solve your equations.

Thats where I need the help :)
 
  • #15
You listed four methods. Surely at least one of them should work.
 
  • #16
That's the problem of where I'm stuck. Help a brother out?
 
  • #17
Since you already know that the system will be undergoing harmonic motion, you can let ##y_1 = a \sin \omega t, y_2 = b \sin \omega t ##, and solve for ##a##, ##b## and ##\omega##. There will be two values for ##\omega##, and for each one, a pair of ##a## and ##b##. So you will have $$ (y_1^{(1)}, y_2^{(1)}) = (a_1 \sin \omega_1 t, b_1 \sin \omega_1 t) $$ and $$ (y_1^{(2)}, y_2^{(2)}) = (a_2 \sin \omega_2 t, b_2 \sin \omega_2 t) $$ The general solution is then $$ A (y_1^{(1)}, y_2^{(1)}) + B (y_1^{(2)}, y_2^{(2)}) $$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #18
The only question remaining is how the heck do I solve for a, b, w1 and w2?
 
  • #19
You should obtain a system of to equations linear in ##a## and ##b##. Two coefficients of the linear system will depend on ##\omega^2##. The system will have the trivial solution ##a = b = 0##. You need to find a non-trivial solution. For that, you must equate the determinant of the system with zero, that will give you an equation for ##\omega^2##. Solve it, you will end up with two values for ##\omega^2##. Then substitute each one into the system and obtain ##a## and ##b##.
 
  • #20
A(y(1)1,y(1)2)+B(y(2)1,y(2)2) is what we have...so a and b must equal 0? I should be able to plug ANY numbers into each a and b and be able to have them equal correct? Or is there a correct way to do this...?
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
994
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K