How can I use IFT to find the inverse of a function?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TylerH
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the Inverse Function Theorem (IFT) to find the inverse of a function, specifically examining the case of the function f(x) = x^2. Participants explore the relationship between integration and finding inverses, as well as clarify the distinction between inverse functions and reciprocals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to use IFT to find the inverse of a function, initially suggesting an integration approach that does not yield the expected result for f(x) = x^2.
  • Another participant clarifies that IFT refers to the Inverse Function Theorem and notes a confusion between inverse functions and reciprocals.
  • A participant elaborates on the definition of an inverse function, emphasizing the need for one-to-one functions and discussing their understanding of the theorem and its application.
  • There is a mention of integrating 1/f'(x) to find the inverse, with the participant expressing uncertainty about the integration process or variable choice in the context of f(x) = x^2.
  • One participant states the fundamental property of inverse functions, f^{-1}(f(x)) = x, without further elaboration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct application of IFT and the integration method for finding inverses, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential issues with the integration process and the conditions under which the inverse function exists, particularly for non-one-to-one functions like f(x) = x^2.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and practitioners in mathematics, particularly those exploring calculus concepts related to inverse functions and the Inverse Function Theorem.

TylerH
Messages
729
Reaction score
0
How does one use IFT to find the inverse of a function? I thought it was something like [tex]\int \frac{dx}{df(x)}dx[/tex]. But that doesn't work with f(x)=x^2:[tex]\int \frac{dx}{2x}=\frac{1}{2} \log{x} \neq f^{-1}(x)[/tex].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BTW, IFT = Inverse Function Theorem.

The reason I asked is because I remember something like this from calc II and I was wanting to use it to find the inverse of a function.
 
You seem to be mixing up inverse with reciprocal. Example: the inverse of y=x2 is x = √y, not y= 1/x2.
 
Thanks for the reply! I was beginning to wonder if I was so incorrigibly wrong that no one was even willing to try. :P

The reciprocal is the multiplicative inverse, and multiplication is a function that forms a group over the rationals. The inverse of a function is the function created by mapping each element of the range to the element of the domain that maps to it (and it only exists for one to one functions). I'm generally advanced in math, I've just been slipping a little because I don't have any math classes this year.

I got 1/(2x) from dx/(df(x)). df(x) = 2x dx.

The theorem I'm referring to is stated here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_function_theorem#Statement_of_the_theorem. From that theorem, I should be able to integrate 1/f'(x) to find f inverse. Like this: [tex]f^{-1}(f(x))=\int \frac{dx}{f'(x)}[/tex]. However, this doesn't work with f(x)=x^2 (at least not for me, see my first post). I think I'm either integrating incorrectly or integrating in terms of the wrong variable. So, I guess my question should be: "How is IFT applied to find the inverse of x^2"?
 
f-1(f(x)) = x.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K