MHB How Can I Visualize a $\pi/2$ Rotation About $(1,1,0)^t$ in $\mathbb{R}^3$?

kalish1
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
I am trying to visualize the following rotation of $\mathbb R^3$, but it is very difficult. I want to get the answer by intuition, and not by using the Rodrigues rotation formula or conjugation of matrices, etc.

Help please.

**Problem statement:** Determine the matrix that represents the following rotation of $\mathbb R^3$: an angle of $\pi/2$ about the fixed axis containing the vector $(1,1,0)^t$

Here is what I have tried in my diagram:

![Coordinate axes][1]

Should I find a 3x3 rotation matrix $A$ such that $A(1,1,0)^t=(-1,1,0)^t$?

[1]:
View attachment 1648
 

Attachments

  • 88MKh.png
    88MKh.png
    997 bytes · Views: 126
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
kalish said:
Should I find a 3x3 rotation matrix $A$ such that $A(1,1,0)^t=(-1,1,0)^t$?

The axis is invariant, so that should be $A(1,1,0)^t=(1,1,0)^t$ instead.

You already found a perpendicular vector (-1,1,0).
You need a 3rd vector that is perpendicular to both the axis and this one, completing an orthogonal set.
And more specifically, a vector that "turns" in the right direction.
You can find it by calculating the cross product of (1,1,0) and (-1,1,0), yielding (0,0,2).

That gives you the set of equations (note that the vectors must have equal lengths):
$$A(1,1,0)^t=(1,1,0)^t$$
$$A(-1,1,0)^t=(0,0,\sqrt 2)^t$$
$$A(0,0,\sqrt 2)^t=(1,-1,0)^t$$

Or in matrix form:
$$A \begin{bmatrix}
1 & -1 & 0 \\
1 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \sqrt 2
\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}
1 & 0 & 1 \\
1 & 0 & -1 \\
0 & \sqrt 2 & 0
\end{bmatrix}$$
Solve for A.
This is easiest to do by performing matrix operations on the right that execute a gaussian elimination, ending up with an identity matrix on the left and the actual A matrix on the right.
That is, subtract multiples of one column from another, both left and right.
And swap columns, both left and right.
 
Here is a picture.

rotation.png


It is done using TikZ package 3dplot.
 
Perhaps noteworthy for visualization is that (-1,1,0) is rotated onto the positive z-axis,
which is in turn rotated to (1,-1,0).
 
Thread 'How to define vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
677
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K