MHB How can $j^{2}$ and $j^{2312}$ be related in complex number evaluations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Drain Brain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relationships
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating complex powers of the imaginary unit $j$, specifically $j^{2312}$ and its reciprocal. It establishes that $j^2 = -1$, $j^3 = -j$, and $j^4 = 1$, which leads to the conclusion that $j^{2312} = 1$ since 2312 mod 4 equals 0. The reciprocal of $j^{2312}$ is also determined to be 1. The conversation emphasizes the cyclical nature of powers of $j$ and their reciprocals, highlighting a consistent pattern in their evaluations. Overall, the relationship between the initial evaluations and the final results is clarified through modular arithmetic.
Drain Brain
Messages
143
Reaction score
0
can you help me how to formally present a solution to this problem

show that $j^2=-1$, $j^3=-j$, $j^4=1$ and $\frac{1}{j}=-j$, $\frac{1}{j^2}=-1$, $\frac{1}{j^3}=-j$, $\frac{1}{j^4}=1$. From the result of these, evaluate $j^{2312}$ and its reciprocal.

sure I can solve for $j^{2312}$ and its reciprocal, but the thing that I need help with is how can I relate the first part of the task to the last part of the problem given.

thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Drain Brain said:
can you help me how to formally present a solution to this problem

show that $j^2=-1$, $j^3=-j$, $j^4=1$ and $\frac{1}{j}=-j$, $\frac{1}{j^2}=-1$, $\frac{1}{j^3}=-j$, $\frac{1}{j^4}=1$. From the result of these, evaluate $j^{2312}$ and its reciprocal.

sure I can solve for $j^{2312}$ and its reciprocal, but the thing that I need help with is how can I relate the first part of the task to the last part of the problem given.

thanks!

you know $j^4=1$
2312 mod 4 = 0

hence $j^{2312} =1$

its reciprocal = $\frac{1}{1} = 1 $
 
The powers of $i$ form a 4 cycle:$1 \to i \to -1 \to -i \to 1 \to \cdots$

The reciprocals (multiplicative inverses) of powers of $i$ form the same cycle, IN REVERSE ORDER:

$1 =\dfrac{1}{1} \to -i = \dfrac{1}{i} \to -1 = \dfrac{1}{i^2} \to i = \dfrac{1}{i^3} \to 1 \cdots$

Suppose we want to find: $\dfrac{1}{i^n}$

and we know that $n = 4k + 3$.

then: $\dfrac{1}{i^n} = \dfrac{1}{i^{4k+3}} = \dfrac{1}{i^{4k}}\cdot\dfrac{1}{i^3}$$= \dfrac{1}{(i^4)^k}\cdot\dfrac{1}{i^3} = \dfrac{1}{1^k}\cdot\dfrac{1}{i^3}$$= 1\cdot\dfrac{1}{i^3} = \dfrac{1}{i^3} = \dfrac{i^4}{i^3} = i$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top