How can kinetic energy and momentum be conserved in an elastic collision?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conservation of momentum and kinetic energy in elastic collisions, specifically addressing the equations used to describe these phenomena. The momentum conservation equation, m1u1 + m2u2 = m1v1 + m2v2, and the kinetic energy conservation equation, (m1u12/2) + (m2u22/2) = (m1v12/2) + (m2v22/2), are confirmed to be applicable in different contexts. The discussion clarifies that while both equations are valid, they serve different purposes, with momentum conservation being universally applicable in all collisions, while kinetic energy conservation specifically applies to perfectly elastic collisions. The distinction between vector and scalar quantities is emphasized, highlighting the importance of direction in momentum calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of elastic collisions in physics
  • Familiarity with momentum and kinetic energy equations
  • Knowledge of vector and scalar quantities
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Learn about vector quantities in physics, focusing on velocity
  • Explore the implications of conservation laws in different physical scenarios
  • Investigate real-world applications of momentum and energy conservation in collisions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of momentum and energy conservation in collisions.

Hypercubes
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I must be overlooking something here. In an elastic collision, both momentum and kinetic energy are conserved, right? The math is not making sense...

Homework Equations


Momentum is conserved:
m_{1}u_{1}+m_{2}u_{2}=m_{1}v_{1} + m_{2}v_{2}

and kinetic energy is conserved:
\frac{m_1u_1^2}2+\frac{m_2u_2^2}2=\frac{m_1v_1^2}2+\frac{m_2v_2^2}2

The Attempt at a Solution


How is this possible? The two equations are not equivalent. If, for example, I solve for v2:
v_{2} = (m_{1}*u_{1} - m_{1}*v_{1} + m_{2}*u_{2})/m_{2}
with the first formula, but
v_{2} = \sqrt{(m_{1}*u_{1}^2/m_{2} - m_{1}*v_{1}^2/m_{2} + u_{2}^2)} with the second.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
obvoiudly the 2 eqn's are not same ... if they were same when what will be the use of 2 eqn's ? ...
if they were same ... you'll get(suppose) v = a+ 1 ... from eqn 1
and v = a+1 from 2 again ...

then how will they help solve your problem

like in math you get 2 eqn's ...
2a + 3b = 5
18a + 17b = 25 ... they will not give identical expression for a ... that's why you can solve for a,b
 
cupid.callin said:
obvoiudly the 2 eqn's are not same ... if they were same when what will be the use of 2 eqn's ? ...
if they were same ... you'll get(suppose) v = a+ 1 ... from eqn 1
and v = a+1 from 2 again ...

then how will they help solve your problem

like in math you get 2 eqn's ...
2a + 3b = 5
18a + 17b = 25 ... they will not give identical expression for a ... that's why you can solve for a,b
Well, often in physics equivalent equations are used for solving for different things.

Then which one should be used for elastic collisions?
 
Hypercubes said:
Well, often in physics equivalent equations are used for solving for different things.
like?

Hypercubes said:
Then which one should be used for elastic collisions?
both ... in some cases one might be enough but in complex questions you need to use both
 
I figured out the problem. There is only one value for which they are both equal, and this would only occur in a perfectly elastic collision. So for realistic collisions, the momentum one should be used.
 
-Simplify the problem by taking unit masses and cancelling the 1/2 factor.
v1+v2=u1+u2; v1^2+v2^2=u1^2+u2^2. Square the two sides of the first equation and subtract from the second and get; v1*v2=u1*u2 as a solution satisfying both conditions. This remains correct if the masses are not equal or the velocities are general vectors.
Of course we assume there is no change of energy into potential energy due to changes in position. This condition is satisfied only if the two come from far away and go back far away after their elastic collision.
 
Hypercubes said:
I figured out the problem. There is only one value for which they are both equal, and this would only occur in a perfectly elastic collision. So for realistic collisions, the momentum one should be used.

That is the way we work.

In EVERY collision, momentum is conserved. In elastic collisions energy is also conserved. If you are unsure of whether a collision is elastic - stick with the momentum equation.

Note, while the equations involved the same variables, The first one used the Vector velocities, where as the Energy equation only uses the speed - the magnitude of the velocity.

I one case, a change in direction is important - in the other it is not.
 
Hypercubes said:

Homework Statement


I must be overlooking something here. In an elastic collision, both momentum and kinetic energy are conserved, right? The math is not making sense...


Homework Equations


Momentum is conserved:
m_{1}u_{1}+m_{2}u_{2}=m_{1}v_{1} + m_{2}v_{2}

and kinetic energy is conserved:
\frac{m_1u_1^2}2+\frac{m_2u_2^2}2=\frac{m_1v_1^2}2+\frac{m_2v_2^2}2

The Attempt at a Solution


How is this possible? The two equations are not equivalent. If, for example, I solve for v2:
v_{2} = (m_{1}*u_{1} - m_{1}*v_{1} + m_{2}*u_{2})/m_{2}
with the first formula, but
v_{2} = \sqrt{(m_{1}*u_{1}^2/m_{2} - m_{1}*v_{1}^2/m_{2} + u_{2}^2)} with the second.

Thanks in advance!

m_{1}\vec u_{1}+m_{2}\vec u_{2}=m_{1}\vec v_{1} + m_{2}\vec v_{2}

\frac{m_1|u_1|^2}2+\frac{m_2|u_2|^2}2=\frac{m_1|v_1|^2}2+\frac{m_2|v_2|^2}2

One is vector and the other is scalar.
Velocity 5m/s going north is not equal to 5m/s going south.
For scalar both are identical.

\vec v_{2} \ne |v_{2}|
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K