How Can Linear Motion Equations Explain Particle Dynamics and Car Acceleration?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on two problems related to linear motion equations. In part A, the challenge is to prove that the product of the times t1 and t2 equals (2h)/g for a particle projected upwards, with hints provided to equate the heights at those times. In part B, the average speed of a car accelerating from rest, maintaining a constant speed, and then decelerating is analyzed, leading to the conclusion that the total journey time is 2t seconds. The discussion also addresses confusion over the area under the speed-time graph and the implications of changing the speed limit to (1/2)v. Overall, participants seek clarification on applying motion equations and graphing concepts to solve the problems effectively.
mcintyre_ie
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Hey
Ok, so I am having troule with yet another accelerated linear motion question...

any help is desperately needed and very much appreciated :)

So here it goes:

(A) A particle is projected vertically upwards with velocityum/s and is at a height h after t1 and t2 seconds respectively. Prove that:
t1.t2 = (2h)/g

(B) A car accelerates uniformly from rest to a speed v m/s. It then continues at this constant speed for t seconds and then decelerates uniformly to rest.
The average speed for the journey is (3v)/4

(i) Draw a speed-time graph and hence, or other wise, prove that the time for the journey is 2t seconds.

(ii) If the car driver had observed the speed limit of (1/2)v, find the least time the journey would have taken, assuming the same acceleration and deceleration as in (i).

Ok, so for part a, I've been told that "setting those equal should make it easy to get the result". Basically what i took that up as meaning is " h=h " so "(-g/2)t1^2+ u t1 = (-g/2)t2^2+ u t2 " , which gives me two variables t1 and t2, equating to each other. Where am i going wrong here? Is there some thing about the times that I am missing or maybe something else pretty obvious that I am missing? When i try to "fix" my answer i get " (2h)/g = 8ut - 4t^2 ". Which is very very wrong...

So that was part a, now onto part b:

Ive drawn the graph, and made a very dodgy comp reproduction:

Graph Pic

All i can make out is that the area of space 1 is .5(t1)(v) = distance, area of space 2 is (t)(V) and area of space 3 is (.5)(t2)(v).
So again I've got 3 variables (t1, t2 and V). V i can keep, since the average speed is given as being = (3v)/4 (i think this is right anyway). So now that I've done some very basic (very possible that its just basically wrong too...) stuff, can anybody give me a little more help ASAP?
Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggested that, since h= (-g/2)t12+ u t1 and
h= (-g/2)t22+ u t2 and you are asked about when the two have
the same height, you try setting them equal:

h=(-g/2)t12+ u t1(-g/2)t22+ u
t2.

Now, Combine those! (-g/2)(t12-t22)+
u(t1-t2)= 0.


Major hint! FACTOR t12-t22.

"All i can make out is that the area of space 1 is .5(t1)(v) = distance, area of space 2 is (t)(V) and
area of space 3 is (.5)(t2)(v). So again I've got 3 variables (t1, t2 and V)."

Actually, your graph is very good. You have a trapezoid with height v. The top "base" is t and
the bottom base is t1+ t+ t2 so the area is (1/2)v(t1+ 2t+
t2). The average speed is that area divided by the total time,
t1+ t+ t2 that gives
(1/2)v(t1+ 2t+ t2)/(t1+ t+ t2)= 3v/4 or
(t1+ 2t+ t2)/(t1+ t+ t2)= 3/2.
(t1+ t2+ 2t)= (3/2)(t1+t2) + (3/2)t so
(1/2)(t1+ t2)= -(1/2) t. That is, t1+ t2= t. The total
time the vehicle is moving is (t1+ t2)+ t= 2t !
 
Part A:

Ok, so I am trying to prove that t1.t2 = (2h)/g , and I've got to try and get that from "h=(-g/2)t12+ u t1(-g/2)t22+ ut2" - even with your "major hint" (?!?) I am a little lost still. My brain has gone into serious meltdown over the summer vacation... I've got a very very vague idea of how it *might* come out, but i need another "major" hint at least.

Part B:
(i)
We don't actually have trapezoids on our curriculum, so i was trying to take the area in 3 segments, as you can see from my diagram, which added *slightly* to the confusion.
Towards the end of the proof you say
(1/2)(t1+ t2)= -(1/2) t. That is, t1+ t2= t
Im a little confused as to where the minus sign went after you multiplied across by two. Is it just because a minus answer wouldn't make any sense or is there something else I am not getting?

(ii)
If the car driver had observed the speed limit of (1/2)v, find the least time the journey would have taken, assuming the same acceleration and deceleration as in (i).

Regarding this one, I am a little unsure as how to start off, i know the the maximum speed is now (1/2)v, instead of v in the last question... Thats about as much as i know as being true, regading the rest, I am pretty lost, help! please!

Thanks again for the help and send some more my way asap!
 
Last edited:
(A) A particle is projected vertically upwards with velocityum/s and is at a height h after t1 and t2 seconds respectively. Prove that:
t1.t2 = (2h)/g

t1 and t2 are both solutions to the quadratic equation

(-g/2)t^2+ vt= h which is the same as (g/2)t^2- vt+ h= 0
which is again the same as t^2- (2v/g)t+ 2h/g= 0

Saying that t1 and t2 satisfy t^2- (2v/g)t+ 2h/g= 0 means that

(t-t1)(t-t2)= t^2- (2v/g)t+ 2h/g.

Multiply that out and see what happens.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
981
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K