edward
- 64
- 165
Evo said:So did I!
LOL My vision is going, I thought at first it was a spot on my monitor and I actually tried to wipe it off.

The discussion revolves around improving photography skills for new camera owners, focusing on techniques, critiques of specific photographs, and the importance of lighting and composition. Participants share their experiences and suggestions related to capturing architectural subjects and landscapes.
Participants generally agree on the need for practice and experimentation in photography, but there are multiple competing views regarding the impact of lighting conditions and composition techniques. The discussion remains unresolved on what constitutes a "flat" image and how to best approach lighting in photography.
Limitations include varying definitions of what makes a photo "good" or "bad," as well as differing opinions on the effects of lighting and weather conditions on photography outcomes.
New camera owners, photography enthusiasts, and individuals interested in improving their skills in capturing architectural and landscape photography may find this discussion beneficial.
Evo said:So did I!

lisab said:I guess I'm the odd one out...I focused on the bird.
edward said:That rock does capture the eye. Yet if the picture was a story the main character would be the road. (does that make any sense ??)
edward said:That rock does capture the eye. Yet if the picture was a story the main character would be the road. (does that make any sense ??)
wolram said:Yes it makes sense now, by heck i can see me becoming an artist.
BobG said:Or another clue. The entire left third of the picture is dead space.
Another picture that fills the whole frame (I have a bigger selection at home. These are what I happened to have on my thumb drive.) But this was a pretty awesome Jeep. This was the only picture of it where I was in the right place at the right time. My other pictures of it made the viewer wonder why he liked to park in such strange places - you couldn't feel any motion.
http://img379.imageshack.us/img379/3823/chinamangulch028yu0.jpg
Low resolution barely does the picture justice. Don't make a mistake or you'll damage the rock.
BobG said:Or another clue. The entire left third of the picture is dead space.
Another picture that fills the whole frame (I have a bigger selection at home. These are what I happened to have on my thumb drive.) But this was a pretty awesome Jeep. This was the only picture of it where I was in the right place at the right time. My other pictures of it made the viewer wonder why he liked to park in such strange places - you couldn't feel any motion.
http://img379.imageshack.us/img379/3823/chinamangulch028yu0.jpg
Low resolution barely does the picture justice. Don't make a mistake or you'll damage the rock.
glondor said:That church is amazing. Just the age of it is something. The link to the story of the arc and the church history is fantastic. As a mini documentary on the church, This is a great job Wollie.
Redbelly98 said:I was going to suggest the 1/3 rule too, but see others have already chimed in. I thought of it when I saw this photo of Wolram's:
As your soliciting advice, Wolram, I'll just say this might be a really nice shot if the thing in the dead center were off to one side or the other.
Another aspect of photo composition is to look for something to "frame" the rest of the picture. See Andre's photo in post 41 for a nice example of framing.
You might read here:
http://www.digitalphotoguides.com/composition.html
and also see if you can find useful tips at these links:
http://www.google.com/search? ...hanks Mark next time i will try the 1/3 rule.