How Can One Prove a Function Lacks an Elementary Antiderivative?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Term
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of proving that certain functions lack elementary antiderivatives, specifically focusing on functions like \( \int x \tan x \, dx \) and \( \int e^{-x^2} \, dx \). Participants explore the terminology related to primitive functions and seek methods or references for demonstrating the non-existence of elementary antiderivatives for specific integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the term 'primitivable' and discusses the challenge of finding primitive functions expressed in terms of elementary functions.
  • Another participant suggests that certain integrals, such as \( \int e^{-x^2} \, dx \), likely do not have primitive functions in elementary terms, referencing results from Mathematica.
  • References to literature are provided, including works by Marchisotto and Zakeri, and Conrad, which discuss integration in finite terms and the Liouville theory.
  • Participants express interest in understanding how to prove the non-existence of elementary antiderivatives for specific functions, such as \( e^{-x^2} \).
  • There is a discussion about the accessibility of academic resources like JSTOR and university libraries for further research.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the methods for proving the lack of elementary antiderivatives, and multiple viewpoints regarding the existence of such functions remain. The discussion is primarily exploratory, with references to literature suggesting various approaches.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the difficulty in finding specific proofs or resources, indicating a potential gap in accessible information on the topic. The discussion also highlights the reliance on definitions and terminology that may not be universally understood.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and researchers interested in advanced calculus, specifically those exploring the properties of integrals and the theory of integration in finite terms.

TD
Homework Helper
Messages
1,016
Reaction score
0
It sounds a bit strange in English (although we have the term in Dutch), so I'm not sure whether this is a generally known/used mathematical term: 'primitivable'. If not, it just comes down to find a primitive function F of f, so that F'=f. Specifically, I'm wondering about primitive functions in terms of (a finite number of) elementary functions.

Recently, someone asked me to find

[tex]\int {x\tan xdx}[/tex]

Using integration by parts, this comes down to finding

[tex]\int {\ln \left( {\cos x} \right)dx}[/tex]

Because of this, and the result from Mathematica (involving poly logarithms), I told the guy that this function probably doesn't have a primitive function, at least not expressed as a finite number of elementary functions. I answer the same thing when someone asks to find the indefinite integral of the more known e^(-x²).

Now on http://mathworld.wolfram.com/IndefiniteIntegral.html" , it says that this is exactly the case for a few of those well-known integrals (numbered line 8). But what interests me is that it also states that Liouville was able to show this. I was wondering how one can show/prove such a thing, in general or for these specific functions. I wasn't able to find anything while searching, perhaps because I'm searching on the wrong terms.

Perhaps someone knows how this is done, can be done or where it can be found? I'd love to see this shown for e^(-x²) for example.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try:

Marchisotto and Zakeri, "An Invitation to Integration in Finite Terms", The College Mathematics Journal, Vol 25, No 4 (Sept., 1994) pp 295 - 308

Kasper, "Integration in Finite Terms: the Liouville Theory", Mathematics Magazine, Vol 53, No 4 (Sept 1980) pp 195 - 201.

Conrad's "Imossibility Theorems in the Theory of integration":
http://www.claymath.org/programs/outreach/academy/LectureNotes05/Conrad.pdf

The first two can be found in jstore and give a bit of a general overview. Conrad's goes into details of proofs with the main goal being the Gaussian and logarithmic integrals. There will be oodles more, using "Integration in Finite Terms" will bring up lots of hits, these just happen to be the ones I have on hand. (Alternate English wording- "Integration in Elementary Terms", "Liouville Theory" is another way to go, and of course plunder the bibliographies in the above)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I never used jstore before, just went to the website and I'll look into that.
Perhaps they have the books at the university library, I'll be checking it soon.

Thanks for the titles and tips, I'll have another try at google as well :smile:
 
TD said:
I never used jstore before, just went to the website and I'll look into that.
Perhaps they have the books at the university library, I'll be checking it soon.

You'll probably figure it out quickly if you haven't already, but it's jstor, not jstor"e" like I said earlier, the link is http://www.jstor.org/
With an "e" in various forms you get credit card applications, japanamation, sunglasses,...

My internet connection is through my university so I forget sometimes that you need a subscription to access jstor. If you're not in a similar situation you can try at your university library, they'll often have campus wide liscences to stuff like this (MathSciNet and so on). Those two are from pretty common journals though.

TD said:
Thanks for the titles and tips, I'll have another try at google as well :smile:

No problem.:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K